The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle Part 5: Diary of the Dead

The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle

Wel­come to The George A. Romero Zom­bie Cycle Film Fes­ti­val. Join The Dork Report in revis­it­ing all five canon­i­cal episodes in the orig­i­nal epic zom­bie saga:

Diary of the Dead movie poster

 

This is not an opin­ion you’re likely to find any­where else on the inter­net, but we here at The Dork Report are pre­pared to argue that Diary of the Dead is the best of the entire George A. Romero zom­bie cycle so far. It sports the best spe­cial effects, is the least repet­i­tive or trigger-happy, and is a wel­come return to the focused social satire of the first (Night) and sec­ond (Dawn) installments.

Curi­ously, Diary of the Dead is the first to break the con­ti­nu­ity of Romero’s ongo­ing story of soci­ety in zom­bie melt­down. The first four films fol­low a rough chronol­ogy: Night of the Liv­ing Dead depicts the ini­tial wave as seen by a small group caught in a coun­try farm­house. Dawn of the Dead takes place a few weeks later, show­ing the break­down of cities (and even the media). Day of the Dead fea­tured an iso­lated group sur­viv­ing in iso­la­tion as the world was long since over­run by the undead. Land of the Dead shows the ulti­mate gated com­mu­nity fall to an evolved zom­bie horde. But Diary of the Dead is a return to the early days of the out­break, a more fer­tile ground for sto­ry­telling: you never get tired of human char­ac­ters wit­ness­ing such hor­rors for the first time.

Diary of the DeadSav­ing the human race, one non­fic­tion doc­u­men­tary short sub­ject at a time

The rules are still the same: sim­ply, the dead don’t stay dead. The zom­bie epi­demic is not due to a plague or virus, which was the potent con­tri­bu­tion of Danny Boyle’s 28 Days Later to the zom­bie genre. Arguably, Romero’s con­cept is more bleak. A virus might be mit­i­gated or even cured, but if any­body, any­body at all, that dies will revive as a unin­tel­li­gent car­niv­o­rous mon­ster that feels no pain and never tires, it can­not be stopped. If human­ity is to some­how regroup and sur­vive, it will for­ever have to burn or decap­i­tate any­one that ever dies.

Diary of the Dead opens on a group of Uni­ver­sity of Pitts­burgh film stu­dents mak­ing a tongue-in-cheeck mummy movie in the woods of Penn­syl­va­nia, under the guid­ance of alco­holic Pro­fes­sor Maxwell (Scott Went­worth). Many of these kids are priv­i­leged, but judg­ing from the events of Romero’s other zom­bie films, we know that the lux­u­ries of the rich are of lit­tle worth against the liv­ing dead. Obvi­ously none of these movie afi­ciona­dos have ever seen a zom­bie flick. One of them, Eliot (Joe Dini­col), wears Coke-bottle glasses in an appar­ent homage to Romero’s famous spec­ta­cles. Bud­ding direc­tor Jason Creed (Joshua Close) looks down his nose on the com­mer­cial hor­ror genre, and has the not-so-secret ambi­tion to become a doc­u­men­tary film­maker. But Jason gets his chance to do both, as he doc­u­ments their their flight from a real-life plague of zom­bies. Jason’s footage, later com­pleted by girl­friend Debra (Michelle Mor­gan) com­prises a film within a film: “The Death of Death.”

Diary of the DeadRomero’s scathing indict­ment of our bro­ken health care sys­tem, or just some more zom­bie gore?

In a world in which nearly every­one car­ries a cell­phone cam­era around in their pocket, “shoot me” can have a dif­fer­ent mean­ing than you usu­ally hear in zom­bie movies. With a batch of young film­mak­ers doc­u­ment­ing a real-life tale of hor­ror using new portable video tech­nol­ogy, Diary of the Dead super­fi­cially resem­bles Clover­field (read The Dork Report review). One of Cloverfield’s most telling moments showed a group of New York­ers instinc­tively react­ing to the hor­ri­ble sight of a chunk of the Statue of Lib­erty hurtling into the mid­dle of a street by whip­ping out their cell phone cam­eras and tak­ing pic­tures to trans­mit to their friends. But Diary of the Dead’s true inspi­ra­tion is actu­ally a bit older; it rips off the basic plot of The Blair Witch Project, in which a batch of stu­dent film­mak­ers set off to shoot a hor­ror film in the woods and acci­den­tally stum­ble onto the real thing. Clover­field became increas­ingly implau­si­ble as the flee­ing teenagers cling to their cam­eras through­out their tra­vails. In con­trast, Diary of the Dead sur­pris­ingly sports more believ­able psy­chol­ogy than Clover­field, con­stantly ques­tion­ing its char­ac­ters’ com­pul­sion to doc­u­ment every­thing. Indeed, it’s one of the biggest themes of the movie.

Diary’s mix of themes also includes the return of the media as a promi­nent pres­ence for the first time since Night and Dawn. In what I felt was one the film’s only dra­matic mis­steps, the char­ac­ters first learn of the zom­bie break­out via radio (really? radio? in an age of instant text mes­sag­ing?), and are con­vinced of the incred­i­ble news reports a lit­tle too quickly. But per­haps their imme­di­ate accep­tance of what the voices of author­ity tell them is one of Romero’s points.

Two char­ac­ters in Dawn of the Dead were mem­bers of the tra­di­tional media of broad­cast news. But in this case, some­thing only pos­si­ble in the 21st cen­tury inter­net age, the Diary of the Dead kids are able to become part of the medium itself. Jason starts out as a frus­trated doc­u­men­tar­ian mak­ing a silly com­mer­cial mummy film, but given the chance he chooses to doc­u­ment. As cit­i­zen jour­nal­ists, they edit their footage on lap­tops and post to YouTube and MySpace. They also down­load other clips from around the world, pro­vid­ing the film with what are basi­cally a series of short vignettes. They watch as U.S. SWAT clean out zom­bies from an apart­ment com­plex, and as coun­ter­parts on the other side of the globe doc­u­ment an over­run Japan. One of the spook­i­est clips is a brief shot from the point of view of a truck dri­ving under a bridge from which some­one has hung them­selves. After the truck cab jos­tles the corpse, it starts to move.

Three radio mono­logues were voiced by hor­ror genre lumi­nar­ies Guillermo Del Toro (whose ghost story Devil’s Back­bone shares some ele­ments of the zom­bie genre), Simon Pegg (who paid homage to the genre as com­edy with Shawn of the Dead), and Stephen King (bril­liant as a heart­land evan­gel­i­cal preacher: “Get down on your &$#@ing knees!”). There’s also a funny bit fea­tur­ing a badass Amish guy, who’s deaf but handy with a scythe and dynamite.

The end­ing to this very short movie (a lit­tle over 90 min­utes) is a bit abrupt. But given that it is nar­rated by Debra, it is pos­si­ble she has sur­vived beyond what we’ve seen, long enough to release “The Death of Death” in some form, per­haps after humans have reclaimed the planet. One might imag­ine Diary’s premise would lend itself to a lower bud­get than the grandiose Land of the Dead, which starred actual stars like Den­nis Hop­per and John Leguizom­bie — sorry — John Leguizamo. But Diary sports a big­ger cast, more loca­tions, and even more accom­plished CG, so it can hardly have been cheaper to make.


Offi­cial movie MySpace page: www.myspace.com/diaryofthedead

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle Part 4: Land of the Dead

The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle

Wel­come to The George A. Romero Zom­bie Cycle Film Fes­ti­val. Join The Dork Report in revis­it­ing all five canon­i­cal episodes in the orig­i­nal epic zom­bie saga:

Land of the Dead movie poster

 

George A. Romero’s spo­radic zom­bie flicks are some­times decades apart in pro­duc­tion, but nev­er­the­less form a chrono­log­i­cal sequence telling the story of the down­fall of soci­ety from every angle. Night of the Liv­ing Dead (1968) is set in the early days, with a few ran­dom civil­ians trapped in a farm­house. Dawn of the Dead (1979) zooms out a lit­tle to see what’s going on in cities and sub­ur­bia, and Day of the Dead (1985) exam­ines a final remain­ing pocket of sur­vivors months into the plague. Land of the Dead opens some time after the zom­bie epi­demic has swept the world, and the sur­viv­ing dregs of human­ity have retreated behind the for­ti­fied walls of the ulti­mate gated com­mu­nity, a city dubbed Fiddler’s Green. Romero has used each of his zom­bie films to satir­i­cally artic­u­late some social com­men­tary, and here his tar­gets seem to be big busi­ness and class war­fare. Another pos­si­ble alle­gor­i­cal tar­get is the Israel / Pales­tine con­flict. Have humans walled the zom­bies out, or walled them­selves in?

A man named Kauf­man (Den­nis Hop­per) has set him­self up as mayor/president/king of Fiddler’s Green. Kauf­man is very much a busi­ness­man along the lines of Don­ald Trump or Michael Bloomberg, so here Romero seems to equate big busi­ness with total­i­tar­i­an­ism. Kaufman’s machi­na­tions ensure that his sup­posed safe haven is actu­ally a highly tiered class soci­ety. The rich live in high-rise com­fort while the under­classes starve in skeezy street-level slums. We know soci­ety is truly depraved when caged go-go dancers are the only form of entertainment.

Eugene Clark in George A. Romero's Land of the Deadwet zom­bies smell like wet, uh, zombies

In the world out­side, the zom­bies have long since eaten all humans within reach, and have noth­ing left to do but stand around. Despite the big bud­get, there only seem to be about a dozen of them. Some have returned to old rou­tines: work­ing gas sta­tions, push­ing shop­ping carts, and bang­ing tam­bourines. Dawn of the Dead showed zom­bies instinc­tu­ally drawn to the shop­ping mall (a new Amer­i­can inno­va­tion at the time) like pil­grims to Mecca. But Land of the Dead Goes fur­ther and sug­gests they have even greater pow­ers of logic, and can feel actual emo­tions such as vic­tim­iza­tion. Their leader Big Daddy (Eugene Clark) is soul­ful and sym­pa­thetic like Bub the zom­bie from Day of the Dead.

Kauf­man sends min­ions Riley (Nathan Fil­lon) and Cholo (John Leguizamo) out into the infested waste­lands, in car­a­vans of heav­ily armored vehi­cles. They dis­tract the “stench” (the deroga­tory term of choice for the undead) with fire­works as they loot for food and valu­ables to cart back to stock Kaufman’s larders in Fiddler’s Green. Riley and Cholo are old friends since fallen out, and their rela­tion­ship pro­vides the one gen­uinely funny bit of dia­logue: happy-go-lucky Cholo tells the per­pet­u­ally dour Riley: “Didn’t I tell you not to bang chicks with worse prob­lems than you?” That’s not bad advice, actually.

The intel­li­gent zom­bies, appar­ently feel­ing dis­en­fran­chised, orga­nize and mount an attack on the city. Any­way, Riley and Cholo finally become dis­il­lu­sioned about Kaufman’s utopia. Together with Slack (Asia Argento, daugh­ter of Dario Argento, who col­lab­o­rated with Romero on Dawn of the Dead), they try to escape for the imag­ined safe haven of Canada (as if they think they are merely dodg­ing the draft and not the twin threats of plague and humanity’s own venal over­lords). In true Romero fash­ion, the vil­lain­ous Kauf­man also hap­pens to be a racist, shout­ing epi­thets at the zomb­i­fied Cholo (John Leguizom­bie?) as he comes to kill him. If there ever were a point in human his­tory when race will have truly become irrel­e­vant, this ought to be it.

Dennis Hopper in George A. Romeros' Land of the DeadDen­nis Hop­per as the mayor from hell, or is that the mayor OF hell?

I don’t think Romero and his zom­bie films would be remem­bered with­out the racially charged end­ing of Night of the Liv­ing Dead and the pointed satire of con­sumerism found in Dawn of the Dead. But if he had started out with some­thing as unfo­cused as Land of the Dead, he prob­a­bly wouldn’t have been. Romero admits to Par­al­lax view he didn’t fully work out the anal­ogy: “I have to tell you that even when we started to shoot, I was wor­ried that this isn’t quite clear. Who are the ter­ror­ists, is it Cholo and his gang or the zom­bies? And it gave me a lit­tle pause, but we had to start shoot­ing because we had the money. I’m being per­fectly hon­est, I have to sit down and re-analyze it and fig­ure it out. Some­times you just run on instinct.” Even the round­table of hor­ror afi­ciona­dos on InternalBleeding.net agree that the movie is “not scary, but really gross.”

Land of the Dead obvi­ously has the biggest bud­get of all of Romero’s zom­bie cycle so far, and remains the only one with well-known stars. But it is only super­fi­cially “bet­ter” than its pre­de­ces­sors, fea­tur­ing big­ger names and more tech­no­log­i­cal pol­ish. As is the case with many a Hol­ly­wood pro­duc­tion, raised finan­cial stakes bring a low­er­ing of stan­dards and dimin­ish­ing returns: more money in, more shit out. A “some time ago…” pro­logue mon­tage illus­trates for the slower mem­bers of the audi­ence what zom­bies are all about. Per­haps the movie stu­dio exec­u­tives were pitch­ing the film to audi­ences beyond the usual hor­ror genre ghetto already versed with the zom­bie genre.


Offi­cial movie site: www.landofthedeadmovie.net

Homepageofthedead.com’s exten­sive archive of Land of the Dead info

Must read: The Light That Failed: George Romero’s Dead Rock On by Kath­leen Mur­phy; and George Romero Sur­veys the Dead by Sean Axmaker, both on Par­al­lax View

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle Part 3: Day of the Dead

The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle

Wel­come to The George A. Romero Zom­bie Cycle Film Fes­ti­val. Join The Dork Report in revis­it­ing all five canon­i­cal episodes in the orig­i­nal epic zom­bie saga:

Day of the Dead movie poster

 

Day of the Dead (1985) is the third episode in George A. Romero’s con­tin­u­ing tale of civilization’s col­lapse in the event of a global zom­bie epi­demic. This and the big-budget Land of the Dead (2005) are tied for the worst entries in the series. What makes the first two (Night and Dawn) of merit is their sur­pris­ingly acute social satire, but here Romero loses his crit­i­cal focus in favor of gore and gen­eral unpleas­antry with lit­tle redeem­ing value.

After the ini­tial wave of undead in Night of the Liv­ing Dead and the col­lapse of cities and sub­ur­bia in Dawn of the Dead, Romero now jumps still for­ward in time. Sev­eral months into the zom­bie plague, a dozen humans hud­dle iso­lated in an under­ground bunker. Their fortress is suf­fi­cient to pro­tect them from the bar­bar­ians out­side the gates, but they have lost radio con­tact with the out­side world. They make occa­sional sor­ties to nearby cities via heli­copter, but encounter noth­ing but more hordes of zom­bies. For all they know, they are the last humans on the planet.

Lori Cardille in Day of the DeadWhen there’s no more room in hell, zom­bies will break through the sty­ro­foam walls

The dis­parate batch of sur­vivors in Night of the Liv­ing dead was essen­tially a cross-section of civ­i­liza­tion, but Romero nar­rows his focus here onto the mil­i­tary and sci­en­tific worlds. The humans trapped under­ground include three sci­en­tists, two civil­ians, and seven sol­diers. All of them are slowly los­ing their minds save for level-headed sci­en­tist Dr. Sarah Bow­man (Lori Cardille), valiantly research­ing a cure. As is now cus­tom­ary in Romero’s zom­bie flicks, Sarah is an atyp­i­cal pro­tag­o­nist for a hor­ror movie. The most capa­ble and sane char­ac­ter in Night of the Liv­ing Dead was a black man (Duane Jones), a huge deal for movies of any genre in 1968, and still rare now. Sarah is a woman, another social group his­tor­i­cally sub­ju­gated by soci­ety, not to men­tion typ­i­cally reduced to scream­ing eye candy in hor­ror movies.

The nerve-wracking 28 Days Later (2002), direc­tor Danny Boyle’s con­tri­bu­tion to the zom­bie genre, bor­rowed this sce­nario of an iso­lated batch of male sol­diers act­ing with­out com­mand, sur­rounded on all sides by hos­tile forces, and locked in a fortress with only one woman. Not sur­pris­ingly, things get ugly. To a one, the sol­diers are despi­ca­bly racist and illog­i­cal. But leader Cap­tain Rhodes (Joe Pilato) is actu­ally cor­rect about one key fact of their sit­u­a­tion: the head sci­en­tist they have been ordered to defer to is indeed totally mad. Dr. Matthew “Franken­stein” Logan (Richard Lib­erty) is more inter­ested in domes­ti­cat­ing zom­bies into slaves than he is in either cur­ing (as Sarah is try­ing to do) or erad­i­cat­ing them (as, nat­u­rally, the sol­diers would have it). His star lab rat is a cap­tive zom­bie dubbed Bub (Sher­man Howard). The chained and tor­tured Bob is sur­pris­ingly sym­pa­thetic, pos­si­bly even moreso than hero­ine Sarah. He’s also the first instance in Romero’s movies of an intel­li­gent, self-aware breed of zom­bie we won’t see again until twenty years later in Land of the Dead. But nei­ther film makes much of the con­cept of zom­bies as a new life form, as opposed to the clas­sic remorse­less adver­sary typ­i­cal for the genre.

Sherman Howard in Day of the DeadBub Zom­bie wants his MTV

As dis­cussed in The Dork Report’s review of Night of the Liv­ing Dead, one key aspect of the zom­bie genre that has fueled its con­tin­u­ing appeal over the years is that a plague is a great lev­eler. Every­one is vul­ner­a­ble to dis­ease. Every­one is equal after death (or is that undeath?), be they male or female, rich or poor, of any race. And for the sur­vivors, once soci­ety breaks down (and it always does when the undead walk the streets), all the money and crea­ture com­forts in the world become irrelevant.


Must read: Home­page of the Dead’s com­plete Day of the Dead archives, includ­ing the orig­i­nal script

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle Part 1: Night of the Living Dead

The George A. Romero Zombie Cycle

Wel­come to The George A. Romero Zom­bie Cycle Film Fes­ti­val. Join The Dork Report in revis­it­ing all five canon­i­cal episodes in the orig­i­nal epic zom­bie saga:

Night of the Living Dead movie poster

 

I haven’t had the plea­sure of see­ing what is now rec­og­nized as the first zom­bie movie ever made: White Zom­bie (1932), star­ring none other than Bela Lugosi. But arguably, George A. Romero’s Night of the Liv­ing Dead (1968) is the actual zom­bie urtext. It pre­ceded the first of its four offi­cial sequels by almost a decade, but laid down the defin­i­tive tem­plate for the great flood of deriv­a­tives, remakes, homages, and ripoffs to come. Night of the Liv­ing Dead is in the pub­lic domain, and can be legally down­loaded for free from Archive.org.

If there is any doubt as to the endurance of the genre, check out Wikipedia’s com­pi­la­tion of over 300 zombie-themed fea­ture films. Zom­bies thrive online in the open-ended zom­bie nar­ra­tive Zom­bieAt­tack slowly unfold­ing on Twit­ter, and in online shrines to the undead like AllThingsZombie.com. Max Brooks has cor­nered the lit­er­ary zom­bie field with his books The Zom­bie Sur­vival Guide (2003) and World War Z (2006) (the first a dis­pos­able tri­fle, but the sec­ond a grip­ping tour de force). Zom­bies have invaded the Mar­vel Uni­verse comics, ironic t-shirts, and hacked road­work signs in Austin.

Night of the Living DeadBraaaaaaaaaaaaaains!

One may won­der about the men­tal health of such obses­sive zom­bie fans, but now that The Dork Report is host­ing a Romero Zom­bie Cycle film Fes­ti­val, I must now count myself among them. Also, the word “zom­bie” is just kind of fun to say. Zom­bie, zom­bie, zom­bie. Per­haps sens­ing the recent spike in the zom­bie zeit­geist, Romero him­self has picked up the pace of his zom­bie cycle, adding fresh new entries in 2005 and 2007, with yet another planned for the near future.

What exactly is the appeal? The basic zom­bie con­ceit is uncom­pli­cated. Indeed, the Night of the Liv­ing Dead mar­ket­ing tagline “They won’t stay dead!” pretty much says it all. Sim­ply, any and all dead peo­ple (no mat­ter what the man­ner of their expi­ra­tion) will inevitably come back to life as unthink­ing, unfeel­ing, car­niv­o­rous mon­sters. There’s some­thing pure to Romero’s orig­i­nal con­cept, with­out the com­plex­i­ties added by later zom­bie sto­ries. Hor­ror and sci­ence fic­tion blog io9 posits that war and social upheaval cor­re­late with spikes in zom­bie movie pro­duc­tion. Danny Boyle’s 28 Days Later (2002), for­ever retooled the zom­bie con­cept for a world obsessed with con­ta­gious dis­eases (SARS, AIDS), and the essen­tially ani­mal­is­tic bad­ness of human nature (tor­ture, ter­ror­ism). Boyle’s zom­bies don’t want to eat; they are just plain mad.

Night of the Living DeadThis is how you do The Mon­ster Mash

Romero’s zom­bies have some rudi­men­tary intel­li­gence and are able to open doors, employ sim­ple tools like blud­geons, and are afraid of fire. But they have no rem­nants of their for­mer mem­o­ries or per­son­al­i­ties, and exist only to sup upon the liv­ing. Com­mon to nearly every zom­bie tale is that an epi­demic effects a break­down of soci­etal order, be it on a micro (such as the clas­sic hor­ror movie sce­nario of a few sur­vivors locked in a farm­house in Night of the Liv­ing Dead) or macro scale (wit­ness the total col­lapse of civ­i­liza­tion in Brooks’ novel World War Z). There’s a basic pes­simism inher­ent in the genre; every­thing we regard as human is frag­ile. Faced with zom­bie hordes, the liv­ing turn on each other, cut and run, or totally shut down.

Romero & John A. Russo’s Night of the Liv­ing Dead screen­play includes some pseudo-scientific tech­nob­a­b­ble con­cern­ing a return­ing space probe con­t­a­m­i­nated with radi­a­tion from Venus, but for all intents and pur­poses the ori­gin of the phe­nom­e­non is irrel­e­vant to the story. Later zom­bie films would intro­duce the con­cept of a blood-transmitted virus, but it is irrel­e­vant here whether or not any vic­tim is con­t­a­m­i­nated by a germs or extrater­res­trial radi­a­tion. Merely dying is all it takes to become a mon­ster. In a way, Romero’s orig­i­nal con­cep­tion of the zom­bie, absent of any plague metaphor, is the bleak­est of all vari­ants. Human soci­ety will be for­ever changed in a world in which even those that die nat­u­rally will have to be decap­i­tated before they revive as beastly ghouls.

Duane Jones in Night of the Living DeadBen (Duane Jones) greets the undead hordes

Like all of Romero’s zom­bie flicks, Night of the Liv­ing Dead is set in the Pitts­burgh, PA area (except Day of the Dead, which is the odd one out for many rea­sons to be dis­cussed in the forth­com­ing Dork Report review). The open­ing sequence is set in grave­yard lit­tered with Amer­i­can flags, per­haps meant as a silent allu­sion to the vast num­bers of fresh corpses being sent back from the Viet­nam War. A ran­dom assort­ment of sur­vivors bar­ri­cade them­selves in a farm­house. Romero tells Parallax-view.org that the cast and crew actu­ally lived in that farm­house while film­ing: “We had no bread. We were lit­er­ally sleep­ing out of that farm­house, chop­ping ice out of the tank behind the toi­let bowl in order to wash our faces, and we were tak­ing baths out in the creek.”

In the best hor­ror movie tra­di­tion, we have a cross-section of soci­ety with rep­re­sen­ta­tives of every gen­der, age, class, and race: a trau­ma­tized woman, a young cou­ple, a clas­sic nuclear fam­ily, and a lone black man. For all intents and pur­poses, their var­i­ous social stand­ings are erased as they all must unite to defend them­selves against a com­mon foe. Ben (Duane Jones) proves him­self the most intel­li­gent, sane, and capa­ble of the bunch. But the humans can barely agree on any­thing, and expend most of their energy on infight­ing. One sus­pects that they wouldn’t be able to get along even with­out the zom­bie hordes assem­bling outside.

Night of the Liv­ing Dead is noto­ri­ous for remain­ing unrated by the MPAA, proudly show­cas­ing a con­sid­er­able amount of gore (and even a lit­tle nude zom­bie der­rière) unprece­dented in 1968. But I think it’s fair to say that the true rea­son the movie is remem­bered as more than a cheapie hor­ror flick is its African Amer­i­can pro­tag­o­nist. Of supe­rior intel­li­gence and matu­rity than every­one else, he alone (spoiler alert!) sur­vives while the rest of the gang self-destructs. But unbe­knownst to him, author­i­ties have mobi­lized to sweep the coun­try­side in order to exe­cute any and all sham­bling zom­bies. It’s impos­si­ble to ignore this group’s resem­blance to a lynch mob of the white male estab­lish­ment, bear­ing scythes and hunt­ing rifles. Given this sce­nario, one might pre­dict the pow­er­ful, racially charged end­ing. In an inter­est­ing styl­is­tic choice, the final sequence is told as a pho­tomon­tage, a series of still images show­ing us the tragic after­math of what hap­pens when the sup­pos­edly civ­i­lized “liv­ing” are given free reign to indulge in their bloodlust.


Free down­load: Archive.org

Must read: Inter­nal Bleed­ing Zom­bie Week ’08

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.