Dennis Hopper’s Colors

Colors movie poster

 

Den­nis Hopper’s Col­ors may be a buddy cop flick on the sur­face, but it’s hardly typ­i­cal high-concept Hol­ly­wood mate­r­ial. It does have a token over­ar­ch­ing plot (involv­ing a mis­matched pair of cops trac­ing the per­pe­tra­tors of a drive-by shoot­ing), but it’s merely a loose thread to hold the movie together. If nei­ther a char­ac­ter study nor a plot-driven thriller, Col­ors is a por­trait of an issue, a set­ting, a problem.

A pro­to­type for the HBO series The Wire, Col­ors is actu­ally a por­trait of the dete­ri­o­rated, hope­less sit­u­a­tion in a failed Amer­i­can city lost to gangs and the drug trade. But unlike The Wire, which deeply explores the eco­nom­ics of how and why gangs func­tion as orga­ni­za­tions, Col­ors doesn’t offer much detail on how they oper­ate and what they do. How­ever sen­si­tive and bal­anced Col­ors may be, it still takes the point of view of pre­dom­i­nantly white law enforce­ment. As such, it’s easy to see why film­mak­ers shortly turned to films like Men­ace II Soci­ety (read The Dork Report review) and Boyz N the Hood (read The Dork Report review), which would look at some of the same issues from the other side of the milieu.

Sean Penn in ColorsSean Penn in Col­ors: “You don’t wanna get laid, man. It leads to kiss­ing and pretty soon you gotta talk to ‘em.”

The inter­est­ing title most obvi­ously refers to the term for a nation’s flag(tying in with the themes of war and the insti­tu­tion that wage it) or the sig­na­ture col­ors of three major war­ring L.A. gangs: the Bloods (red), Crips (blue), and a Latino gang (white). The real col­ors that divide these groups are, of course, race. The one sign of equal­ity in late 80s L.A. is that nearly every­one calls each other Holmes.

The nar­ra­tive is loosely hung on sev­eral cliches, most notably the trope of vet­eran cop sad­dled with rookie part­ner. Offi­cer Hodges (Duvall) is bit­ter at being drafted into the L.A.P.D. C.R.A.S.H. anti-gang pro­gram, after a life­time of ser­vice that ought to have qual­i­fied him for sen­si­ble hours, a safe desk job, and more time with his fam­ily. Offi­cer McGavin (Penn) is an aggres­sive, preen­ing dandy, eager to attack the gang prob­lem with the blunt tool of incarceration.

Robert Duvall in ColorsRobert Duvall in Col­ors: “you got a prob­lem with the whole fuckin’ world, and I’m in it.”

But it’s not long after the movie sets up these cliches that it begins to knock them down. The osten­si­bly wiz­ened Hodges makes a crit­i­cal mis­take, set­ting free a young gang­banger on the assump­tion that a brush with the law would scare him straight, while simul­ta­ne­ously intend­ing it to be a les­son to the head­strong book ‘em-type McGavin. The punk turns out to have been a major player in the shoot­ing. Another cliché short-circuited: McGavin romances a local girl from the bar­rio (Maria Con­chita Alonso), but she turns out to be far from the madonna he imag­ined. Not only that, she rejects him anyway.

Col­ors ends on a very down beat, not just the death of a sig­nif­i­cant char­ac­ter, but what comes after. McGavin is forced into the posi­tion of impart­ing wis­dom before he’s earned much him­self. The film ends with a long shot held on his face (echoed much later in the final shot of mind Michael Clay­ton — read The Dork Report review) as he most likely pon­ders his ineffectiveness.

Of note are early appear­ances by Don Chea­dle and Damon Wayans, the lat­ter fea­tur­ing in a stand-out sur­real sequence in which his char­ac­ter T-Bone is out of his mind on drugs. Her­bie Hancock’s score has not dated well, nor has the vin­tage rap sound­track, includ­ing the angry theme song by Ice-T. The open­ing cred­its are set to “One Time One Night” by the local L.A. band Los Lobos.


Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Milk

Milk movie poster

 

Any friend of The Dork Report will know that I almost uni­ver­sally hate biopics. As I’ve com­plained in my reviews of Con­trol, The Div­ing Bell and the But­ter­fly, and even Walk Hard, I believe that the fea­ture film is fun­da­men­tally ill suited for biog­ra­phy. One seem­ingly minor les­son from col­lege that wound up stick­ing with me is Edgar Allen Poe’s def­i­n­i­tion of the short story as a prose piece that can be expe­ri­enced in a sin­gle sit­ting (The Phi­los­o­phy of Com­po­si­tion, 1846). No one expects a seri­ous por­trait of a person’s entire life in a few pages, so why should we applaud a movie? The fea­ture film’s two-hour run­ning time is more akin to a short story than to a book-length novel or biog­ra­phy, and yet the biopic is a dom­i­nant genre in movies. I would argue the pri­mary rea­son is that they give ambi­tious actors the oppor­tu­nity to exer­cise their imi­ta­tion skills. It pleases audi­ences who per­ceive “true sto­ries” as being of greater merit than fic­tion (mere make-believe!), and pan­der­ing to the Acad­emy, who love noth­ing bet­ter than a tech­ni­cally impres­sive mim­icry of an addict or hand­i­capped per­son. I actu­ally wel­comed Walk Hard, for although a ter­ri­ble movie itself, it finally mocked the for­mu­laic drug-addicted musi­cian biopics Ray, Walk the Line, La Vie En Rose, and El Cantante.

Sean Penn in Milk

Direc­tor Gus Van Sant and writer Dustin Lance Black’s Milk, on the other hand, strikes me as less insin­cere than its peers. For one thing, it exam­ines only a ten-year span of a man’s life, avoid­ing the genre’s usual Cliff’s Notes-like approach to sum­ma­riz­ing a famous figure’s life into a series of high­lights. And yes, Sean Penn did win an Oscar for a lively, spir­ited per­for­mance worlds apart from his nat­ural demeanor. But I believe he, like every­one else involved, approached the project with noth­ing but the high­est integrity, and truly hoped the timely project could affect pub­lic opinion.

Milk was in the­aters dur­ing shortly after the national debate over California’s Propo­si­tion 8, which denied the right to marry to a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of the pop­u­la­tion (thanks to com­menter Sap­pho­crat below for the cor­rec­tion). It’s impos­si­ble to miss the par­al­lels to Har­vey Milk’s strug­gle in 1978 against Propo­si­tion 6, which would have enabled the fir­ing of homo­sex­ual teach­ers and (this is the truly amaz­ing part) any­one that sup­ported them. One of the movie’s biggest achieve­ments is that it empha­sized the sheer urgency of the gay rights move­ment. Equal­ity was not just some­thing that’s time had come. Gays were not only fight­ing for rights they hoped some day to have; they were fight­ing to keep the what rights they did have from being taken away.

Josh Brolin in Milk

I must admit that all I knew about Har­vey Milk was the tan­gen­tial bit of trivia that his assas­sin Dan White (Josh Brolin) was the first to employ the infa­mous “Twinkie Defense” in court, claim­ing that a diet of junk food altered his body chem­istry and cre­ated a tem­po­rary state of insan­ity. Har­vey was orig­i­nally a New York insur­ance man, clos­eted from cowork­ers and fam­ily, but not so much so that he couldn’t brazenly pick up a stranger on the sub­way (with gay­dar so fine-tuned that he could imme­di­ately tell that what I would assume to a normal-looking dude in 70s fash­ions was a fel­low Friend of Dorothy). Scott Smith (James Franco) urges him to move to Cal­i­for­nia where he can live more hon­estly. Har­vey ini­tially is happy to just live his new life, but becomes politi­cized as he faces prej­u­di­cial oppo­si­tion to his small business.

Although it may seem to con­tra­dict part of my tirade against biopics at the begin­ning on this post, it might have been illu­mi­nat­ing to see a lit­tle more of Har­vey as a younger man, before he blos­somed into a polit­i­cally aware, out man. We only learn through pass­ing dia­logue that he hid not only his sex­u­al­ity but even Scott’s very exis­tence from his fam­ily. If the aim was to com­press the essence of Har­vey Milk into a short-form nar­ra­tive, it strikes me that the major dra­matic arc would be his trans­for­ma­tion from a clos­eted man into some­one that would later ask an entire com­mu­nity to come out at once.


Offi­cial movie site: www.milkthemovie.com

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Into the Wild

Into the Wild

 

Like many young men cursed with a priv­i­leged life of edu­ca­tion and time to think for them­selves, Chris McCan­d­less (Emile Hirsch) wanted only a vaguely defined “truth” and to not have to rely on any­one. Syn­the­siz­ing his read­ing of Henry Thoreau and Jack Lon­don, he imag­ined for him­self a life of self-sufficiency in the wilder­ness. So McCan­d­less dropped out of soci­ety in the sum­mer of 1990, leav­ing behind all con­nec­tions what­so­ever, includ­ing his legal name and iden­tity. Despite his absolutely clean break, he never seemed to view this trans­for­ma­tion as per­ma­nent; he men­tions more than once that he may write a book when he “comes back.”

Inter­est­ingly for a young man, he also seems to make a point of avoid­ing even tem­po­rary female com­pan­ion­ship. He rejects the friend­ship of Jan (Kather­ine Keener), and aban­dons his younger sis­ter Carine (Jena Mal­one), the per­son with whom he appar­ently had the clos­est bond. Carine nar­rates the film, with total sym­pa­thy for his beliefs and actions. But even she points out that he acted with “char­ac­ter­is­tic immoderation.”

Into the WildThe Rough Guide to Self-Actualization

McCan­d­less died alone in August 1992. He remains a con­tro­ver­sial fig­ure (should his asceti­cism be admired, or was he a fool?), and his soli­tary death the sub­ject of an intrigu­ing mys­tery (was he really trapped with food poi­son­ing, or did he allow him­self to die slowly as a form of pas­sive sui­cide?). This film inter­pre­ta­tion of his story does make it clear that he was a priv­i­leged kid who hadn’t truly suf­fered. While drink­ing with new buddy Wayne (Vince Vaughn), he lets slip his ado­les­cent belief that one of the worst forms of tyranny in the world is “par­ents.” As we see, his par­ents (Mar­cia Gay Harden and William Hurt) are all too human and not half as mon­strous as he imag­ines. So per­haps his adven­ture was more than an ide­al­is­tic reac­tion to mere money, soci­ety, and mate­ri­al­ism. He was also run­ning away from the “free” things that liv­ing in soci­ety affords, what every­one craves in life: fam­ily, friends, and lovers.

Into the WildHence the title

A note on the music: just as McCan­d­less looks back­wards for lit­er­ary inspi­ra­tion, he also has anti­quated taste in music for a kid liv­ing in the early 90s. His new name for him­self, “Super­tramp” puns on the clas­sic rock band and his new lifestyle. He chris­tens his new and final home, an aban­doned bus, after The Who’s “Magic Bus.” For the music of the film itself, direc­tor Sean Penn drew upon two musi­cians that made names for them­selves in the early 90s: Pearl Jam’s Eddie Ved­der (who con­tributed songs to Dead Man Walk­ing), and guitarist/composer Michael Brook. Vedder’s songs for the film were released as an album, but Brook’s excel­lent score is also avail­able dig­i­tally.

Into the Wild is yet another in a long series of films I’ve seen recently that are based on books I haven’t read (The Kite Run­ner, No Coun­try for Old Men, The Name­sake, The Assas­si­na­tion of Jesse James, etc.). But even so, I believe I can detect a few rem­nants of the film’s prose ori­gins as John Krakauer’s book:

  • the film is bro­ken into “Chap­ters” with onscreen titles
  • voiceover nar­ra­tion
  • the visual device of super­im­posed text from McCan­d­less’ own jour­nals pro­vides a sec­ond “voice”
  • episodic feel — but that’s jus­ti­fied by the events/phases of his jour­ney — he keeps mak­ing clean breaks every time he comes close to set­tling in somewhere

Offi­cial movie site: www.intothewild.com

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


11’09“01 — September 11

11'09

 

A series of short films inspired by or in reac­tion to 9/11 made by direc­tors from nearly every continent.

At first, I thought for sure I would be giv­ing this one more than three stars, but the qual­ity of the short films takes a steep dive after the first two. The first in par­tic­u­lar, by Iran­ian film­maker Samira Makhmal­baf, is excel­lent. It opens on an entire Afghanistan vil­lage emp­ty­ing their well in order to man­u­fac­ture bricks to build shel­ters for when the US will bomb them. A female school­teacher rounds up all the chil­dren and attempts to explain to them what hap­pened in New York, and why the Amer­i­cans are about to kill them. Step one: try to illus­trate the con­cept of a skyscraper.

The short from Egypt is quite bad, and almost laugh­able (dig the ghost of a buff Amer­i­can Marine killed in Beruit, walk­ing out of the ocean, soak­ing wet and top­less). And unfor­tu­nately, Sean Penn’s con­tri­bu­tion was over-edited into obliv­ion. But a late high point is Ken Loach’s doc­u­men­tary about the US-instigated over­throw of Chile’s democratically-elected gov­ern­ment on… wait for it… Sep­tem­ber 11, 1973!

And a bit of trivia: Mira Nair’s short was writ­ten by an old room­mate I had back in film school.