Tokyo!

Tokyo! movie poster

 

Tokyo! is a port­man­teau film com­prised of three shorts set in the epony­mous city, all by direc­tors not them­selves from Japan: Michel Gondry and Léos Carax from France, and Bong Joon-ho from South Korea.

Gondry’s “Inte­rior Design” is based on the comic book “Cecil and Bell in New York” by Gabrielle Bell, with the action trans­posed to Tokyo. At first, her low-key love story doesn’t seem to bear Gondry’s char­ac­ter­is­tic whim­si­cal sur­re­al­ity, but by the end her col­lab­o­ra­tion with Gondry makes per­fect sense. Young cou­ple Hiroko (Ayako Fuji­tani, daugh­ter of Steven Sea­gal) and Akira (Ryo Kase) move to Tokyo, with the hope of find­ing audi­ences for Akira’s pre­ten­tious films. With­out prospects, they crash on the floor of a child­hood friend’s minis­cule flat and quickly out­stay their wel­come. Their opti­mism to find jobs and an apart­ment is quickly dashed — only Akira is suited to menial work, and they can’t even afford the city’s dingi­est rat traps. Like April (Kate Winslet) in Rev­o­lu­tion­ary Road, (read The Dork Report review) Hiroko doesn’t have much ambi­tion of her own beyond sup­port­ing her artist part­ner. After going to extra­or­di­nary lengths on Akira’s behalf with­out feel­ing appre­ci­ated, Hiroko under­goes a fan­tas­ti­cal trans­for­ma­tion and winds up lit­er­ally sup­port­ing a dif­fer­ent artist. The sig­nif­i­cance of title comes clear as she lit­er­ally becomes part of the scenery.

Ayako Fujitani and Ryo Kase in TokyoHiroko and Akira in Tokyo

In Carax’s scat­o­log­i­cal “Merde,” Tokyo is ter­ror­ized by a mad cau­casian with a twisty gin­ger beard and a rig­or­ous diet of flow­ers, yen, and cig­a­rettes. The “sewer crea­ture” (so named by the media) is rel­a­tively harm­less until he dis­cov­ers a cache of grenades in a for­got­ten World War II-era bunker buried beneath the city. Only after he uses Impe­r­ial Japan’s own weapons against them in a ter­ri­ble mas­sacre is he tracked down in his sewer lair and appre­hended. At this point, Carax’s short film becomes a court­room drama, in which eccen­tric French mag­is­trate Maître Voland (Jean-François Balmer) claims to be able to inter­pret the terrorist’s rav­ings, not least includ­ing his name: Merde (“shit”). His scan­dalous speeches incite Japan­ese self-loathing and racism, but the pop­u­lace curi­ously fails to ques­tion whether Voland is some kind of mad ven­tril­o­quist voic­ing his own prej­u­dices through the mouth of an idiot. Merde becomes a pop icon; duel­ing gangs of pick­eters chant “FREE MERDE” ver­sus “HANG MERDE.” Merde is sen­tenced to a Christ-like exe­cu­tion (which also very much resem­bles a sim­i­lar sequence in Lars Von Trier’s Dancer in the Dark), fol­lowed by a cap­tion that threat­ens a sequel set in New York.

Merde Tokyo!Free Merde!

Bong Joon-ho’s “Shak­ing Tokyo” is the tale of a unnamed hikiko­mori (shut-in) liv­ing alone in a totally ivy-covered house, finan­cially sup­ported by a father he hasn’t seen in years. The ago­ra­phobe (Teruyuki Kagawa) has become accus­tomed to a life of lone­li­ness and rig­or­ous rou­tine. One day he meets a cute pizza deliv­ery girl (Yu Aoi), out of his league in terms of looks, but appar­ently with her own share of crip­pling emo­tional issues. She passes out in his foyer dur­ing an earth­quake (not uncom­mon in the vol­canic islands of Japan), and the hikiko­mori reboots her using her self-tattooed but­tons on her body that appear to lit­er­ally con­trol her mood and health. The smit­ten loner escapes his self-created prison to seek her out again. He finds a city full of shut-ins, for whom even another earth­quake isn’t enough to keep them out of their own homes for long.

Yu Aoi  and Teruyuki Kagawa in Tokyo!One large pie with extra neuroses

Offi­cial movie site: tokyothemovie.com

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Synecdoche, New York

Synecdoche, New York movie poster

 

Whether it actu­ally is or not, Synec­doche, New York has the feel of a very, very per­sonal work of art. I know next to noth­ing about writer/director Char­lie Kauf­man, and don’t even nec­es­sar­ily feel like I do now. Then again, few peo­ple do know Kauf­man, as he has famously man­aged to side­step much pub­lic­ity despite per­pe­trat­ing a suc­cess­ful screen­writ­ing career in an indus­try in which the cult of per­son­al­ity applies to everyone.

Synec­doche, New York is Kaufman’s first film as direc­tor, after a string of play­ful yet brainy screen­plays. The best antecedents I can name would be the sur­real satires of Lind­say Ander­son (like O Lucky Man! — read The Dork Report Review) and the Post­mod­ern decon­struc­tion of Tom Stop­pard (espe­cially Rosen­crantz and Guilden­stern are Dead, which wreaks hilar­i­ous havok with no less a holy relic than Ham­let). Kaufman’s hit parade so far includes Being John Malkovich, Human Nature (under­rated! see it!), Con­fes­sions of a Dan­ger­ous Mind, Adap­ta­tion, and Dork Report favorite The Eter­nal Sun­shine of the Spot­less Mind. Being John Malkovich and Eter­nal Sun­shine are both pure plea­sures to watch, but Adap­ta­tion showed the darker side of Kaufman’s bril­liance. As I under­stood the film, the very life itself of screen­writer “Char­lie Kauf­man” (Nico­las Cage) slowly becomes the vio­lent, sexed-up Hol­ly­wood melo­drama he loathes to write. To describe Synec­doche, New York in short­hand, it’s as if the cyn­i­cal, chal­leng­ing nar­ra­tive nature of Adap­ta­tion were crossed with the deep emo­tional impact of Eter­nal Sunshine.

Samantha Morton and Philip Seymour Hoffman in Synecdoche, New YorkHere’s The Dork Report’s the­ory to explain Hazel’s enig­matic burn­ing house: could it be an allu­sion to the Talk­ing Heads song “Love -> Build­ing on Fire”? I’m being seri­ous here…

But what it’s actu­ally “about” would take a lot of analy­sis to fig­ure out, and my sin­gle view­ing is not enough to unpack it (assum­ing my IQ would be up to the task any­way). Like Adap­ta­tion, it’s actu­ally a lit­tle frus­trat­ing to watch, but in a good sense, in that the audi­ence is con­stantly being chal­lenged. I have to admit that I don’t fully “get” it, but I also think it’s clear there’s no sin­gle key to unlock­ing any one mean­ing of the film. I’m giv­ing it the full five-star Dork Report rat­ing because I have enor­mous respect for any such uncom­pro­mis­ing, chal­leng­ing, affect­ing, and frus­trat­ing work of art in cin­ema. That it was pro­duced as a major motion pic­ture star­ring numer­ous famous faces and released in mul­ti­plexes nation­ally along­side the more typ­i­cal fare Saw V and High School Musi­cal 3 is noth­ing less than a mir­a­cle, and gives one hope for the future of the film indus­try. At least four peo­ple walked out of the screen­ing I attended, some dur­ing an uncom­fort­able nude scene fea­tur­ing Emily Wat­son (not uncom­fort­able in that she isn’t beau­ti­ful, because she is, but because the sex scene is so utterly frank). It’s a pity they did, for they missed one of the most weirdly mov­ing last moments of a film I’ve ever seen (although it did have prece­dent in Peter Weir’s The Tru­man Show, which also sug­gested the voice of God towards his sup­pli­cant is akin to that of a film/theater/television director’s towards his actor).

The clos­est thing I’ve seen to Synec­doche, New York is Spike Jonze’s Michel Gondry’s bril­liant music video for Björk’s Bach­e­lorette (Jonze Gondry is a long­time col­lab­o­ra­tor of Kaufman’s, and co-produced Synec­doche, New York). (UPDATE: cor­rec­tions thanks to com­menter Greg. I can’t believe I mixed up two of my favorite direc­tors!) Less a pop music promo than a short film that stands on its own mer­its, Bach­e­lorette recounts the tale of a young coun­try girl who writes her auto­bi­og­ra­phy and moves to the big city, where she falls in love with her pub­lisher. A hit, her book spawns a the­atri­cal adap­ta­tion, in which a young coun­try girl writes her auto­bi­og­ra­phy, moves to the big city, and falls in love with her pub­lisher. A hit, it too spawns a the­atri­cal play. You get the idea: the tale is infi­nitely recur­sive. But each copy is a copy within a copy, each more dis­torted, flimsy, and sad than its source mate­r­ial. Entropy and decay set in, and the world(s) col­lapse in upon them­selves. Her life basi­cally ends at the point she fin­ishes her auto­bi­og­ra­phy and looks only back­wards instead of liv­ing for the future. Watch the video here:

Synec­doche, New York is a pun on the New York city Sch­enec­tady (the loca­tion of Caden’s orig­i­nal the­ater com­pany) and the lit­er­ary term for a fig­ure of speech in which a part stands in for the whole (for exam­ple, “The White House said today…” as used by news­cast­ers rather than spec­i­fy­ing the admin­is­tra­tion, or even more specif­i­cally, the Press Sec­re­tary). The­ater direc­tor Caden Cotard’s (Philip Sey­mour Hoff­man) artist wife Adele (Cather­ine Keener) divorces him and moves to Ger­many with their daugh­ter and Maria (Jen­nifer Jason Leigh), who may be her lover (guest Dork Reporter Snark­bait points out that this is Keener’s sec­ond sex­u­ally ambigu­ous role in a Kauf­man film, here and in Being John Malkovich). Caden wor­ries for the rest of his life that Maria is a bet­ter replace­ment for him­self as hus­band and father.

Caden wins a MacArthur Foun­da­tion Genius Grant, and uses the funds to move to Man­hat­tan and craft an epic play housed in a dis­used the­ater illog­i­cally large enough to hold a scale model of New York City as his set. Out­side, the real Man­hat­tan descends into chaos and war­fare. At one point, the char­ac­ters leave the the­ater and walk past mys­te­ri­ous civil rights atroc­i­ties such as clown-costume-clad sol­diers herd­ing cit­i­zens onto armored busses at gunpoint.

Philip Seymour Hoffman and Hope Davis in Synecdoche, New YorkHope Davis, as the shrink­est with the mostest, offers to shrink Philip Sey­mour Hoffman’s head

Caden’s can­vas is infi­nite, there is no script, and he hopes to find his story as he goes along. The play is in per­pet­ual rehearsal for decades, and remains for­ever unti­tled. I hate to use this kind of cop-out phrase pop­u­lar in col­lege lit­er­a­ture classes, but it truly is “a metaphor for life.” As Caden tries to find mean­ing for the trau­matic events in his life, and to ratio­nal­ize his deci­sions, he casts actors to play him­self and the sig­nif­i­cant peo­ple in his life. Like mem­o­ries being processed by the human brain, he is now able to replay recent painful events in his life over and over, giv­ing direc­tion to his actors on how to express their (his) pain, all with the emo­tional safety of know­ing that it’s all just playacting.

Soon, he takes even another step back, and casts another set of actors to play the first. Real­ity itself begins to break down as in Björk’s Bach­e­lorette, also fea­tur­ing a play within a play within a play, cast with sev­eral pairs of other actors play­ing her­self and her lover as their affair, and entire world, dis­in­te­grates. A sim­i­lar theme of copies and dou­bles also fig­ures into Adap­ta­tion: writer “Char­lie” may or may not have an iden­ti­cal twin brother, shame­lessly able to make the kinds of com­pro­mises nec­es­sary for suc­cess in the movie biz and life itself that he is too weak or too ashamed to do him­self. Is it sig­nif­i­cant, as Kauf­man moves from writer to writer/director, that the cen­tral char­ac­ter of Adap­ta­tion is a writer, and that of Synec­doche, New York is a director?

Samantha Morton, Emily Watson, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Tom Noonan in Synecdoche, New YorkA scene from Synec­doche, New York, star­ring Saman­tha Mor­ton as Hazel, Emily Wat­son as Tammy as Hazel, Philip Sey­mour Hoff­man as Caden, and Tom Noo­nan as Sammy as Caden. Got that?

Caden is beset through­out with a host of mys­tery ill­nesses that for­ever threaten to kill him but never carry through their promise. I caught at least two hints that he may in fact already be dead: his shrink Madeleine Gravis (Hope Davis) makes a seem­ing slip of the tongue and asks why he killed him­self, and later, one of his dop­pel­gängers (Tom Noo­nan) com­mits suicide.

The walls between Caden’s life and his play blur; which is real and which is the play? The dis­pas­sion­ate direc­tor watches from a dis­tance as oth­ers do the dirty work of liv­ing his life for him, such as con­duct his love affairs and breakups with Claire (Michele Williams), Hazel (Saman­tha Mor­ton), and Tammy (Emily Wat­son), that he may not have the emo­tional strength or sex­ual potency to do him­self. Caden even­tu­ally replaces him­self and takes the sim­pler, less demand­ing role of one of the most fleet­ingly minor back­ground fig­ures in his life. Is he an actor in his own play, fol­low­ing the script and direc­tion from some­one else, an invis­i­ble exter­nal force… God? He essen­tially abdi­cates respon­si­bil­ity for his own life, and dies on cue.


Must read: exhaus­tive fan site BeingCharlieKaufman.com

Offi­cial movie site: www.sonyclassics.com/synecdocheny

Buy the DVD and Schoot­ing Script from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Be Kind Rewind

Be Kind Rewind

 

Michel Gondry’s Be Kind Rewind is a more main­stream effort than the per­sonal and heart­felt The Sci­ence of Sleep, but still imbued with his sig­na­ture hand­made style and many of his par­tic­u­lar (some might say pecu­liar) obsessions.

The premise is bril­liant in its sim­plic­ity: a pair of mis­fit doo­fuses acci­den­tally erase every tape in their retro video rental store, and decide to remake an eclec­tic selec­tion of them from scratch. The con­sid­er­able humor comes not just in how Mike (Mos Def) and Jerry (Jack Black) recre­ate shots, cos­tumes, cast­ing, and spe­cial effects, but also in how they must recon­struct entire plots and scenes from mem­ory alone. If you had to con­dense a movie you hadn’t seen since child­hood (say, for exam­ple, Ghost­busters) down to 20 min­utes, equipped only with a cam­corder and a bud­get of approx­i­mately $0, how would you do it? Jerry ran­domly coins the word “sweded” to describe their work, a puz­zling term that isn’t even a pun, but spon­ta­neous absur­dity is a virtue in Gondry’s world.

Be Kind RewindMos Def has mos’ def’ had enough of Tranny Jack

Des­per­a­tion inspires them to find a means of artis­tic expres­sion, some­thing many peo­ple spend life­times day­dream­ing about but never seize for them­selves. Much as how Tim Bur­ton char­ac­ter­ized Ed Wood in the epony­mous biopic, Mike and Jerry have true ama­teurs’ supreme con­fi­dence in their total film­mak­ing abil­i­ties. Their own inge­nu­ity and the power of moviemak­ing inspires them with the real­iza­tion that they can do any­thing and the trust that peo­ple will like what they do. Also like Wood, each obsta­cle they encounter merely increases their creativity.

Even before the incit­ing inci­dent of mass era­sure, Jerry was already some­thing of an out­sider artist. He oper­ated an auto shop with very cre­ative notions of “repair­ing” cars into souped-up rocket-powered Bat­Mo­biles. His char­ac­ter is ini­tially very unlik­able, and evi­dently some­thing of a misog­y­nist. We see him taunt and nearly phys­i­cally threaten a woman in the video store. Later, he reveals a long­ing for cutie Alma (Mel­onie Diaz) work­ing in the local laun­dry, but when moviemak­ing pro­vides him with the oppor­tu­nity to inter­act with her, he treats her as would a lit­tle boy with a “No Girls Allowed” tree­house. But that’s not to imply there’s some­thing cute about his atti­tude towards women; there appears to be a barely sup­pressed con­tempt and threat of violence.

Be Kind RewindHow long until they get around to remak­ing Gummo and Amer­i­can Psycho?

An obvi­ous para­dox is that Be Kind Rewind is a film from a major motion pic­ture stu­dio that cel­e­brates the indie spirit (not to men­tion fair use of copy­righted mate­ri­als) and vil­i­fies the venal movie biz exec­u­tives that inevitably mate­ri­al­ize with cease-and-decist orders. Speak­ing of venal movie execs, the movie’s home at New Line Cin­ema no doubt intro­duced sev­eral hardly canon­i­cal films like the New Line prop­erty Rush Hour 2 into Gondry’s script. The over­abun­dance of New Line posters and VHS tapes in the set design bric-à-brac is some­thing of a joke. While it’s funny that a run-down video store might still have ratty old Blast From the Past posters hang­ing around, would a com­pet­ing main­stream neon-lit DVD store (Block­buster in all but name) really shill for the long-forgotten Woo?

Be Kind Rewind is at its most bril­liant when recre­at­ing clas­sic (and some not-so-classic) moments from cin­ema his­tory, so much so that every­thing else in the film feels like a dis­trac­tion from the true delights. But the pow­er­fully mov­ing cli­max is the pre­mière screen­ing of Mike and Jerry’s mas­ter­piece, made in col­lab­o­ra­tion with their entire com­mu­nity. Their matu­rity as auteurs is marked by their first truly orig­i­nal work; their film within a film is a fic­tion­al­ized musi­cal biopic of Fats Waller. If only all actual musi­cal biopics could be so wonderful!

Full dis­clo­sure: I first saw an advance screen­ing of Be Kind Rewind on Feb­ru­ary 22, but as I was then employed by the movie com­pany dis­trib­ut­ing the film, I decided not to post my thoughts. Regard­less, I had noth­ing to do with mak­ing or mar­ket­ing the film, and any opin­ions expressed above are mine alone.


Must Read: Director-File.com’s Be Kind Rewind archive

Offi­cial movie site: www.bekindmovie.com

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


The Science of Sleep

The Science of Sleep movie poster

 

Michel Gondry is a trea­sure; end­lessly inven­tive and thank­fully pro­lific. His music videos (espe­cially Björk’s “Bach­e­lorette” and The White Stripes’ “Fell in Love With a Girl”) and films (Human Nature & Eter­nal Sun­shine of the Spot­less Mind) are all per­sonal favorites, with “Bach­e­lorette” and Eter­nal Sun­shine both mov­ing me deeply.

But I found myself a tiny bit unsat­is­fied with The Sci­ence of Sleep, despite its flood of orig­i­nal imagery and enthu­si­as­tic per­for­mances. For a movie that con­cerns the blend­ing of fan­tasy with real­ity, I think the prob­lem is that there’s too much real­ity. Stephane (Gael Gar­cía Bernal) expe­ri­ences a smooth con­tin­uüm between his wak­ing and dream life, which his mother explic­itly acknowl­eges as an actual con­di­tion, in other words, a men­tal ill­ness. In the cold light of his mother’s diag­no­sis and his often hurt­ful behav­ior towards his crush Stephanie (Char­lotte Gains­bourg), Stephane is less of a charm­ingly eccen­tric dreamer, and rather a sad case that could prob­a­bly not have a suc­cess­ful rela­tion­ship with­out medication.