Hey Man, It’s Your Trip: Woodstock

Woodstock movie poster

 

The clas­sic fea­ture doc­u­men­tary Wood­stock cap­tures the full expe­ri­ence of the near-mythical 1969 fes­ti­val of the same name, from sep­tic tanks to traf­fic jams to brown acid. It remains an impor­tant record of one of the most peace­ful spon­ta­neous gath­er­ings in human his­tory, not to men­tion the brief-lived spirit of the hip­pie move­ment as a whole.

The orig­i­nal ver­sion directed by Michael Wedleigh, with a young Mar­tin Scors­ese as assis­tant direc­tor and edi­tor and Thelma Schoon­maker as edi­tor, was released the fol­low­ing year and played con­tin­u­ously in the­aters for years. Oddly, it is the only film that the last sur­viv­ing human on earth (Charl­ton Hes­ton) chooses to watch repeat­edly in The Ωmega Man. A Director’s Cut added 40 min­utes of addi­tional footage in 1994, but the new 40th Anniver­sary edi­tion is a whop­ping four hours long, “Inter­fuck­ing­mis­sion” included. It’s unclear whether or not Scors­ese and Schoon­maker were involved in either of the expanded editions.

The film is exper­i­men­tal in for­mat, extend­ing even to the aspect ratio. Nearly the first ten min­utes are win­dow­paned, lead­ing me at first to sus­pect some­thing was wrong with the DVD. But the movie then alter­nates from win­dow­pane to widescreen to splitscreen. The only other movie I can think of off the top of my head that played as loose with aspect ratios is the open­ing sequence to Frank Tashlin’s The Girl Can’t Help It.

Jimi Hendrix in Woodstock

With a leisurely four hours to fill, the first full 25 min­utes con­cern the arrival of early fans while the stage is still being con­structed. A surely ironic mural on one of the famously psy­che­delic car­a­van buses reads “even God loves Amer­ica.” One of the festival’s most iconic images — a pair of nuns flash­ing a peace sign to cam­era — may have been in fact par­tially staged (as alleged in Ang Lee’s Tak­ing Wood­stock). Based on the mem­oirs of Elliot Tiber, Lee’s film goes on to tell a con­flict­ing, largely dis­counted, ver­sion of events in which a small town mis­fit mid­wifes the fes­ti­val, which in turn frees his iden­tity and trans­forms his family.

The first per­for­mance footage in Wood­stock is an extended unbro­ken close-up of Richie Havens’ intense solo per­for­mance. Finally, the cam­eras turn the other way around and look out at the stag­ger­ingly huge crowd. Indeed, as later scenes make clear, so many peo­ple arrived that the ear­li­est arrivals couldn’t phys­i­cally leave. That such a large num­ber of peo­ple coex­isted peace­fully while quite lit­er­ally being trapped is a minor miracle.

Every­body knows the tale of the gar­gan­tuan crowd, but I under­es­ti­mated the scale of the con­cert itself. In my mind, I always pic­tured a tiny stage dwarfed by throngs of hip­pies, but in actu­al­ity, the fes­ti­val itself would have been a large pro­duc­tion even if the crowds hadn’t mate­ri­al­ized. Before sim­ple logic forced the orga­niz­ers to waive the ticket fee, the fes­ti­val had a multi-million-dollar bud­get foot­ing a mas­sive stage, huge tow­ers, power, food, light­ing, and sound system.

A scene from Woodstock

Not all the acts would nec­es­sar­ily be known to later gen­er­a­tions watch­ing the doc­u­men­tary, but there is some sur­pris­ing vari­ety in genre; Joan Baez and Arlo Guthrie’s folk, Sly and the Fam­ily Stone’s funk, and Sha-Na-Na’s retro pop went a long way towards break­ing up the some­times tedious stretches of blues-rock jam­ming. Some key per­for­mances either weren’t filmed (such as The Band, at their request) or shot but excluded from the film (par­tic­u­larly The Grate­ful Dead, whose per­for­mance was com­pro­mised by heavy rain and tech­ni­cal issues), and some of the era’s top acts were absent alto­gether (most notably The Bea­t­les, Bob Dylan, and The Rolling Stones — but Scors­ese would later catch up with all three of them in his own doc­u­men­taries Liv­ing In the Mate­r­ial World, No Direc­tion Home, and Shine a Light). Per­son­ally, I most liked see­ing The Who and Jimi Hen­drix at the height of their pow­ers, and was pleas­antly sur­prised by an obvi­ously ner­vous Crosby, Stills and Nash. CSN claimed it was only their sec­ond gig, and they seemed vis­i­bly relieved to receive applause. Each act was allot­ted only 1–2 songs each, even in the extended ver­sion of the film, which for many of these artists is not enough. I would have liked to see more Who footage, espe­cially the famous moment where the often tem­pes­tu­ous Pete Town­shend famously booted coun­ter­cul­tural icon Abbie Hoff­man off­stage: “Fuck off! Fuck off my fuck­ing stage!”

Inter­views with audi­ence mem­bers dur­ing the con­cert demon­strate that they were already self-mythologizing the event as it was occur­ring around them. A leg­end quickly spread that the gath­er­ing was the equiv­a­lent of a spon­ta­neous city. Not quite, but the actual total of 500,000 peo­ple was noth­ing to sneeze at. But they were all cor­rect that it was noth­ing less than a mir­a­cle that that many peo­ple could gather in one place and sur­vive a mas­sive storm on the sec­ond day, all with­out vio­lence. That is, aside from Town­shend again: “The next fuckin’ per­son that walks across this stage is gonna get fuckin’ killed!”

The film includes co-organizer Michael Lang and con­cert­go­ers fac­ing hos­tile inter­view­ers deter­mined to express their bias that rock music is empty and mean­ing­less. Scors­ese empha­sized sim­i­lar con­fronta­tions in No Direc­tion Home, where Dylan is dogged by con­de­scend­ing reporters deter­mined to under­mine his polit­i­cal and social import.

Wedleigh’s cam­era often seeks out nude young women. The bla­tant scopophilia misses the point of the bur­geon­ing equal­ity between the sexes by the late 60s — not only are the hip­pies embrac­ing free love, they’re also obvi­ously com­fort­able enough in each other’s com­pany to bathe together like chil­dren in a bath­tub. I can’t believe I’m com­plain­ing about the sight of naked girls, but Wedleigh’s cam­era is often just plain lustful.

Aside from free love and unashamed nudity, the next most alien aspect for con­tem­po­rary post-War-on-Drugs view­ers is the prag­matic atti­tude towards con­trolled sub­stances. One of the first peo­ple seen bran­dish­ing a joint onscreen is none other than Jerry Gar­cia, despite his band not appear­ing in the per­for­mance footage. Everybody’s heard about the infa­mously dodgy brown acid, but dig this emi­nently prag­matic announce­ment issued from the stage: “Hey man, it’s your trip, don’t let me stop you, but if you feel like exper­i­ment­ing, try half a tab.” In con­trast, we see a huge crowd prac­tic­ing Kun­dalini yoga, which the guru espouses as an alter­na­tive to drugs.

One of the most strik­ing sequences is when the doc­u­men­tary steps back from the pro­ceed­ings to take in another angle that wouldn’t ordi­nary be cov­ered in a typ­i­cal con­cert doc­u­men­tary. Wedleigh takes the time to meet a Port-O-San main­tainer with one son attend­ing the fes­ti­val and another fly­ing heli­copters in the Viet­nam DMZ.


Buy any of these fine prod­ucts from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report:

 


I Call First: Who’s That Knocking at My Door?

Who's That Knocking At My Door movie poster

 

Mar­tin Scorsese’s first fea­ture film Who’s That Knock­ing at My Door? was shot over the course of sev­eral years, and was orig­i­nally released in 1967 as I Call First. Its piece­meal ori­gins are betrayed by two dis­crete sequences: one recount­ing the mis­ad­ven­tures of a group of slacker friends in down­town New York, and a very dif­fer­ent, more char­ac­ter and dialogue-driven love story between J.R. (Kei­tel) and the unnamed “Girl on the Staten Island Ferry” (Zina Bethune).

Non-linear cross-cutting between the two adds up to more than the sum of their parts. J.R. is increas­ingly hes­i­tant to horse around with his gang­ster friends, a lifestyle involv­ing shak­ing down debtors, ter­ror­iz­ing each other with loaded pis­tols, and going uptown to get with — and then rob — gullible girls. His ret­i­cence is explained by a par­al­lel sequence in which he meets cute with The Girl. Sim­i­larly, their young courtship is given weight by the audience’s knowl­edge of what he’s done with his life so far, and how dras­tic a change he faces by con­sid­er­ing mar­ry­ing her.

Harvey Keitel in Who's That Knocking at My DoorThe pas­sion of Har­vey Keitel

J.R. is much more sen­si­tive than his brutish chums to the splen­dor of nature and to the cathar­sis of cin­ema. His idea of seduc­ing a girl is to lec­ture her on Hol­ly­wood West­erns, John Ford’s The Searchers (1956) in par­tic­u­lar. His mod­els of mas­culin­ity come from the movies, espe­cially John Wayne and Lee Mar­vin, and he divides women into two cat­e­gories: broads and girls (which is another way of say­ing whores and madon­nas). The Girl is savvy enough to know what she’s get­ting into; she clearly catches his mean­ing when he slips and openly refers to her as a broad.

Another piece to the puz­zle was a sex mon­tage added in order to ensure dis­tri­b­u­tion. Scors­ese scores J.R.‘s fan­tasy of sex with a series of women to The Doors’ “The End”, later of course also to become a key ingre­di­ent to his peer Fran­cis Ford Coppola’s mas­ter­piece Apoc­a­lypse Now! (1979).

Harvey Keitel and Zina Bethune in Who's That Knocking at My DoorJ.R. (Har­vey Kei­tel) knows how to romance Zina Bethune: “Let me tell you some­thing, that girl in that pic­ture was a broad”

Hold­ing every­thing together is a fram­ing device in the form of a flash­back to young J.R. being served food by his mother (Cather­ine Scors­ese, Scrosese’s own mother). It’s an obvi­ously happy mem­ory, but we learn that the core theme of the film is that J.R. is emo­tion­ally crip­pled by the Catholic guilt instilled by his fam­ily and upbring­ing. He is unable to con­sum­mate the rela­tion­ship with the girl he loves, and who loves him back. When he finds out she’s a vic­tim of rape, he alter­nates between not believ­ing the facts and blam­ing her. Even in the end, he sees her rape as some­thing he must for­give her for. The penul­ti­mate sequence is a mon­tage of Catholic iconog­ra­phy set to the title track by The Genies.


Buy any of these fine prod­ucts from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report:



Champagne & Reefer: Rolling Stones Shine a Light

Rolling Stones Shine a Light movie poster

 

Mar­tin Scorsese’s long his­tory with musi­cal doc­u­men­taries and con­cert films includes work­ing as assis­tant direc­tor and edi­tor on Wood­stock (1970), direct­ing an account of The Band’s final con­cert as The Last Waltz (1978), exec­u­tive pro­duc­ing and design­ing the shots for Peter Gabriel’s con­cert film PoV (Point of View) (1987), direct­ing part of the mas­sive The Blues tele­vi­sion doc­u­men­tary series (2003), and craft­ing the defin­i­tive Bob Dylan and George Har­ri­son doc­u­men­taries No Direc­tion Home (2005) and Liv­ing in the Mate­r­ial World (2010).

Shine a Light is a lit­tle of all the above, but mostly just a straight­for­ward con­cert film fea­tur­ing the Rolling Stones in a ben­e­fit con­cert thrown at New York City’s Bea­con The­ater in 2006. The Stones are joined by spe­cial guests Christina Aguil­era, Jack White, and Buddy “Moth­er­fucker” Guy (watch the DVD bonus fea­tures for the enter­tain­ing story behind that moniker). It was orig­i­nally released in IMAX, and no doubt loses some­thing in trans­la­tion from 50-foot the­aters screens to small tele­vi­sions. U2 did them one up by releas­ing U23D in 3D IMAX the year before.

Martin Scorsese and The Rolling Stones in Shine a LightAre you sure you want to see these faces in 50-foot-high IMAX?

Like Gimme Shel­ter (1970), a doc­u­men­tary account of the fall­out fol­low­ing the killing of a fan at a Stones con­cert in Alta­mont, Shine a Light is some­times less than totally flat­ter­ing. Mick Jag­ger is seen to be so ruth­lessly single-minded that he will not deign to col­lab­o­rate with Scors­ese. Even when meet­ing no less than Bill Clin­ton, he only wants to talk about whether or not the light­ing will dis­tract from his per­for­mance. But to be fair, The Rolling Stones hit the big time long before either Scors­ese or Clin­ton, so per­haps Jagger’s van­ity may be par­tially excused. Let it not be said that the old codgers in the band don’t embrace new tech­nol­ogy; wit­ness as Jag­ger strikes clas­sic poses for fans in the front row to cap­ture on their mobiles.

Keith Richards and Buddy Guy in The Rolling Stones Shine a LightKeef jams with Buddy “Moth­er­fucker” Guy

Scors­ese is famously a fan, uti­liz­ing Rolling Stones tunes in his sound­tracks so often that Jag­ger now jokes that “Shine a Light was the only film of his not to fea­ture the song Gimme Shel­ter.” I like The Stones well enough, but I’m not a huge fan. Here’s what a sim­i­larly casual lis­tener might learn of them based on Shine a Light:

  • Char­lie Watts, also a suc­cess­ful artist and jazz drum­mer out­side of the Stones machine, comes across as quite dis­tracted, almost to the extent of appear­ing senile (or maybe even more drug-addled than Keith Richards). He behaves the same in vin­tage inter­views scat­tered through­out Shine a Light, so per­haps it’s just his nat­ural demeanor. But there’s no doubt he can still rock his stripped-down drum kit.
  • Mick Jag­ger still has the body of a pre­teen girl, albeit one with impres­sively ripped arms.
  • Every­body knows the leg­endary Keith Richards has abused his body to such an extent that he has no busi­ness still walk­ing this earth. He jokes in the film that he must come from hardy stock, but maybe he is in fact already dead, see­ing as how he barely notices a kiss from Christina Aguil­era. He still has chops, though, beyond going through the highly rehearsed motions of a typ­i­cal Stones spec­ta­cle. In a telling moment, the cam­era catches him alone, play­ing some moody blues licks to him­self as the rest of the band hobnobs.
  • Ron­nie Wood comes across the best, remind­ing fans that although Keith Richards may have co-written many of the most pop­u­lar and endur­ing rock songs of all time, he’s the one that plays all the solos.

Scors­ese includes him­self as a char­ac­ter in his own film, appear­ing at least twice in a char­ac­ter­is­tic track­ing shot that caps the film: fol­low­ing the Stones off­stage and out of the the­ater, and fly­ing up into the night sky over New York. The world will have to wait for Scorsese’s true doc­u­men­tary on the Stones to equal No Direc­tion Home and Liv­ing in the Mate­r­ial World as a true fan’s deep look into some of the world’s most inter­est­ing celebrities.


Offi­cial movie site: www.shinealightmovie.com/

But the Blu-ray or DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Bottle Rocket

Bottle Rocket movie poster

 

Wes Ander­son and co-writer Owen Wilson’s fea­ture debut is based on their 1992 short film of the same name. Like Kevin Smith’s Clerks and Quentin Tarantino’s Reser­voir Dogs, Bot­tle Rocket is Anderson’s urtext. His sig­na­ture style is already fully present: metic­u­lously con­structed of pri­mary col­ors, writ­ten in tor­rents of words, and shot per­pen­dic­u­larly against exact­ing mise en scèné. The Royal Tenebaums is the only of Anderson’s films to fea­ture par­ents as fea­tured char­ac­ters through­out, but Rush­more, The Dar­jeel­ing Lim­ited, and Bot­tle Rocket all con­cern mis­fit sib­lings with largely absent par­ents. Like the Tenen­baums and the Whit­mans (of The Dar­jeel­ing Lim­ited), the Adams broth­ers are priv­i­leged yet seem to pos­sess noth­ing of their own.

Dig­nan (Owen Wil­son) throws in his lot with local crook Mr. Henry (James Caan), who proves both a bad boss and poor father sub­sti­tute. Dig­nan forms an ama­teur gang of sorts with brother Anthony (Luke Wil­son) — an aim­less young man suf­fer­ing from self-diagnosed “exhaus­tion,” and their pushover friend Bob Map­plethorpe (Robert Mus­grave) — of use mostly because he has access to a car. Every detail of Dignan’s grand scheme for his life is plot­ted out in the hand­writ­ten man­i­festo “75-Year Plan — Notes Re: Careers.” As he tells Anthony, “I think we both respond well to structure.”

Robert Musgrave, Owen Wilson, and Luke Wilson in Bottle Rocket“On the run from Johnny Law… ain’t no trip to Cleveland.”

They feel the urge to steal (from a chain book store, hilar­i­ously, and even from their own par­ents’ home), not so much for money itself but to enable their fan­tasy of liv­ing inde­pen­dently on the road. Their dream is that being on the lam would pro­vide the excite­ment they imag­ine their lives lack. But Dignan’s pre­cise vision of the future is dis­rupted at every turn. The most cat­a­clysmic event of all is when the roman­tic Anthony becomes smit­ten with motel maid Inez (Lumi Cava­zos), and he gives up most of their ill­got­ten spoils to help her. Dignan’s own future hasn’t fac­tored in love; even­tu­ally he real­izes he must set off on his own to find his destiny.

The 2007 Cri­te­rion Col­lec­tion edi­tion reprints a 1999 appre­ci­a­tion by pro­ducer James L. Brooks, in which he describes how the neo­phyte film­mak­ers had lit­tle notion of how movies are actu­ally writ­ten and made, espe­cially any aspect thereof involv­ing cre­ative com­pro­mise. Their first draft was report­edly so wordy that a sim­ple table read­ing proved epic:

the longest enter­tain­ment known to man, beat­ing Wagner’s Ring cycle before we reached the halfway point of the read­ing. By the time we approached the last scene, all the water pitch­ers had been emp­tied, yet voices still rasped from overuse, and there were peo­ple in the room show­ing the phys­i­cal signs of starvation.

The script was deemed unfilmable, begin­ning a long process of urg­ing Ander­son and Wil­son to cut mate­r­ial they held dear, and they held every­thing dear. The movie still seemed doomed even after suc­cess­fully shoot­ing a work­able script. When early cuts tested poorly before audi­ences, Brooks tried to con­sole Ander­son and Wil­son by telling them that early feed­back for E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial was also poor, but it was saved by the music and a mem­o­rable logo. Indeed, Brooks cred­its the score by Mark Moth­ers­baugh of Devo for help­ing make the film work.

James Caan and Owen Wilson in Bottle Rocket“This seems like a nice soirée”

James Caan only worked on the film for three days, and still seems bemused by the whole thing. But the result has proven a cult clas­sic, and launched the careers of not only Ander­son but also the Wil­son broth­ers. The Cri­te­rion Col­lec­tion edi­tion also includes Mar­tin Scorcese’s 2000 appre­ci­a­tion from Esquire, in which he cred­its Ander­son with a rare, true affec­tion for his char­ac­ters. Dignan’s belief in his imper­vi­ous­ness is the flm’s “tran­scen­dent moment”: “they’ll never catch me, man, ’cause I’m fuck­ing innocent.”


Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


The Departed

departed.jpg

 

Mar­tin Scors­ese works almost con­stantly, direct­ing doc­u­men­taries between each higher-profile fea­ture film. But the fre­quency of his fic­tion films is far enough apart for them to remain much more hotly antic­i­pated, and every year that went by with him being passed over by the Acad­emy Awards only more firmly estab­lished his sta­tus as a Great Amer­i­can Director.

Despite finally being the occa­sion of his long-overdue recog­ni­tion by the Acad­emy, The Departed prob­a­bly won’t be ranked among his more idio­syn­cratic and per­sonal films like Mean Streets, Rag­ing Bull, and Good­fel­las (not to men­tion his still-underappreciated films about reli­gious faith: The Last Temp­ta­tion of Christ and Kun­dun). The Departed is a remake of the 2002 Chi­nese thriller Infer­nal Affairs, and thus should actu­ally be cat­e­go­rized along­side Scorsese’s other star-studded remake, Cape Fear. Both are undoubt­edly stamped with Scorsese’s auteur touch, but still not among his most dis­tinc­tively per­sonal work.

The DepartedSo, Jack, what was Polan­ski really like?

See­ing the film for the sec­ond time, this time on the small screen, this Dork Reporter is struck by the extremely high energy and pace. Like Michael Mann’s Heat (an influ­ence on Infer­nal Affairs), the story con­cerns the par­al­lel nar­ra­tives of a cop — or should I say “cwawp” — (Leonardo DiCaprio as Billy Costi­gan) and a crim­i­nal (Matt Damon as Colin Sul­li­van). But unlike Mann’s stately pac­ing, Scors­ese keeps every scene remark­ably short and fran­ti­cally cross-cuts between the dual nar­ra­tives. Were Marty and edi­tor Thelma Schoon­maker chug­ging espres­sos in the edit­ing suite?

One aspect of the plot I still don’t fully under­stand: what exactly does crime boss Frank Costello (Jack Nichol­son) offer Colin to ensure such undy­ing loy­alty? It doesn’t seem enough that Frank pro­vided minor char­ity to Colin’s strug­gling fam­ily in his youth. What does Colin really owe him?

The DepartedSo, Jack, what was Anto­nioni really like?

But any nag­ging pac­ing or char­ac­ter issues are more than excused by the price­less repar­tee between Capt. Ellerby (Alec Bald­win) and Sgt. Dig­nam (Marky Mark Mark Wahlberg):



ELLERBY:
Go fuck yourself.

DIGNAM:
I’m tired from fuck­ing your wife.

ELLERBY:
How is your mother?

DIGNAM:
Good, she’s tired from fuck­ing my father.


Offi­cial movie site: thedeparted.warnerbros.com

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.