Blindness

Blindness movie poster

 

Direc­tor Fer­nando Meirelles has exam­ined des­per­ate pres­sure cook­ers City of God) and insti­tu­tional cor­rup­tion (The Con­stant Gar­dener) before. Blind­ness proves per­fect to meld both themes, with a sci­ence fic­tion twist imag­in­ing the down­fall of civ­i­liza­tion itself.

Blind­ness is part of a spe­cial sub­set of the horror/sci-fi/disaster genre: the dystopian end-of-civilization night­mare. Whereas the typ­i­cal entry works by intro­duc­ing a dis­rupt­ing ele­ment into the sta­tus quo (typ­i­cally a mon­ster), a few instead sub­tract one fun­da­men­tal fact of life that we take for granted. The basic recipe is sim­ple: flip one switch, and watch civ­i­liza­tion fall in short order. In Chil­dren of Men (read The Dork Report review), human­ity becomes infer­tile. In the Hap­pen­ing (read The Dork Report review), the bios­phere starts pump­ing out poi­son. In the comic book series Y: The Last Man, all males on the planet sud­denly die off. In innu­mer­able zom­bie flicks (read The Dork Report’s George A. Romero Zom­bie Cycle), death is no longer absolute. It may not be a coin­ci­dence that at least two mem­bers of the Blind­ness cast already have rel­e­vant expe­ri­ence on their résumés: Julianne Moore in Chil­dren of Men and Alice Braga in I Am Legend.

Julianne Moore in Blindness“The only thing more ter­ri­fy­ing than blind­ness is being the only one who can see.”

All of these sto­ries bleed over into the genre realms of sci­ence fic­tion and hor­ror. Blind­ness, how­ever, is based on the mag­i­cal real­ist (if it’s accu­rate for me to call it that) novel by José Sara­m­ago. The novel is set in a generic city, fea­tur­ing unnamed char­ac­ters (the movie, filmed in São Paulo, Brazil, effec­tively pre­serves both con­ceits — I didn’t notice until the cred­its rolled that the char­ac­ters did not have names). With­out get­ting bogged down in pseudo-scientific details, Zara­m­ago posits a highly con­ta­gious “White Blind­ness” that rapidly sweeps the globe, affect­ing every­one but one ran­dom woman. The movie’s expla­na­tion is a far more lit­eral highly com­mu­ni­ca­ble dis­ease, diag­nosed for the audi­ence by the unnamed opthamol­o­gist “Doc­tor” (Mark Ruf­falo). By sheer coin­ci­dence, The Doctor’s Wife (Moore) appears to be immune. The obvi­ous chal­lenge for the film­mak­ers is how to ren­der a prose story about blind­ness into the most visual sto­ry­telling medium of all. Cin­e­matog­ra­pher César Char­lone (who also shot City of God and The Con­stant Gar­dener) meets the chal­lenge by cre­at­ing stun­ning visu­als which para­dox­i­cally obscure. The pic­ture fre­quently flares into a burned-out white­ness, often a relief from the ugly filth in which the char­ac­ters find them­selves liv­ing as the safety net of soci­ety collapses.

The story bru­tally details a basi­cally pes­simistic view of human nature. Right from the start, humanity’s inher­ent greed and avarice make a cat­a­strophic sit­u­a­tion worse. The very first vic­tim of the dis­ease is imme­di­ately exploited by a car thief (ironic, as auto­mo­biles are shortly to become the most futile of valu­ables to steal). As the blind­ness dis­ease spreads, the author­i­ties (rep­re­sented by The Min­is­ter of Health, in what amounts to a cameo by San­dra Oh) attempt to con­tain the infected in iso­la­tion wards, a weak euphemism for con­cen­tra­tion camps. As The Man With the Black Eye Patch (Danny Glover) states in a nicely writ­ten but implau­si­bly elo­quent mono­logue, “the dis­ease was immune to bureaucracy.”

Dany Glover in Blindness“I know that part inside you with no name, and that’s who we are, right?”

The infected are made up of char­ac­ters from many cul­tural and eco­nomic back­grounds, much like Ale­jan­dro González Iñárritu’s Babel (2006). Left alone to self-organize, two oppos­ing soci­eties coa­lesce around two very dif­fer­ent nat­ural lead­ers. The Doc­tor and his Wife cre­ate a frag­ile but func­tion­ing democ­racy, but the King of Ward Three (Gael Gar­cía Bernal) forges a depraved Sodom built on exploit­ing their few resources for short-term base plea­sures. Inevitably, the two fledg­ling states go to war, as much out of ide­ol­ogy as for want of resources. As the ward denizens’ cir­cum­stances get worse and worse, the movie itself becomes a pun­ish­ing expe­ri­ence to watch (an imi­ta­tive fal­lacy). In terms of depic­tions of vio­lence, it is no less explicit than, say, Chil­dren of Men, but wholly lacks that supe­rior film’s dark wit and essen­tial thread of hope. Whereas Chil­dren of Men had no real vil­lain (Luke, Chi­we­tel Ejio­for, was actu­ally more of a Che Guevarra-type rev­o­lu­tion­ary), there is lit­tle or no sub­tlety of char­ac­ter in Blind­ness’ wholly evil bad guys. Would the cen­tral alle­gory be more inter­est­ing to pon­der if the vil­lains were not so unam­bigu­ously mon­strous? Even I Am Leg­end dropped hints that its vampire/zombie-like mon­sters pos­sessed crude intel­li­gence, a will to live, and empa­thy for their own kind.

The frag­ile com­mu­nity in the wards dis­in­te­grates into a hell of gang rape and open war. Then, amaz­ingly, it gets worse. But as the walls of the prison burn, the pris­on­ers dis­cover the doors have actu­ally been left open. If any­thing, the world out­side has become worse off than the pres­sure cooker in which they were impris­oned. After a har­row­ing trip through the dev­as­tated city, they expe­ri­ence one fleet­ing moment of joy as they bathe in the rain. After­wards, they set up an eden in the Doc­tor and his Wife’s for­mer home, like a less-satiric ver­sion of the for­ti­fied sub­ur­ban shop­ping mall in George A. Romero’s Dawn of the Dead (read The Dork Report review). The Doctor’s Wife’s newly extended fam­ily embraces her as their “leader with vision.”


Offi­cial movie site: http://blindness-themovie.com/

Buy the novel or DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


The Big Lebowski

big_lebowski.jpg

 

In 1998, when all the world wanted from Joel Coen and Ethan Coen was another Fargo, they got The Big Lebowski instead. The Coens recently repeated this trick by fol­low­ing up another mas­ter­piece, No Coun­try for Old Men, with the happy-go-lucky Burn After Read­ing. The Dork Report won­ders if this com­pul­sion is by design or if the Coens just can’t help themselves.

Viewed with some puz­zle­ment upon release, The Big Lebowski is now the sub­ject of pop art, annual con­ven­tions, and action fig­ures. The far­ci­cal film noir is ulti­mately an extended “wrong man accused” pas­tiche in the spirit of Alfred Hitch­cock and Ray­mond Chan­dler, but The Coen Broth­ers infuse it with their trade­mark anar­chic spirit and pop­u­late it with char­ac­ters with low (or oth­er­wise chem­i­cally impaired) I.Q.

big_lebowski1.jpgWe don’t roll on Shabbos

The film’s 10th anniver­sary was recently cel­e­brated in a Rolling Stone fea­ture arti­cle, The Decade of the Dude by Andy Greene. John Good­man, Julianne Moore, Steve Buscemi, and Sam Elliott reveal a wealth of anec­dotes and all seem gen­uinely delighted at the film’s cult sta­tus. Good­man, how­ever, alludes to hav­ing had a kind of falling out with the Coens after Oh Brother Where Art Thou. The arti­cle also states that The Coen Broth­ers decline to dis­cuss the The Big Lebowski at all any­more, for unspec­i­fied rea­sons. How­ever, the DVD edi­tion screened by The Dork Report includes the orig­i­nal 1998 con­tem­po­rary elec­tronic press kit includ­ing an inter­view with the Coen Broth­ers in which they gamely dis­cuss the pro­duc­tion (Joel is cred­ited as direc­tor and Ethan as writer, but in truth they have always shared the duties equally). The DVD also pro­vides a peek at cin­e­matog­ra­pher Roger Deakins’ spec­tac­u­lar fan­tasy sequences and unique bowl­ing footage actu­al­ized with a motor­ized cam­era capa­ble of run­ning up to 20 M.P.H.

Jeff Bridges reveals the extent of his actorly craft in prepar­ing for each scene: he would sim­ply ask The Coens, “Did the Dude burn one on the way over?” Most often, the answer was yes, so he would rub his eyes to approx­i­mate the degree of red­ness appro­pri­ate, and pro­ceed. The Dude copes with the tri­als and tribu­la­tions of life with the motto “The Dude abides,” but the cir­cum­stances in which he finds him­self dur­ing this mis­ad­ven­ture leave him less in a state of zen than one of para­noia. No doubt a life­time of pot abuse has harshed his mel­low somewhat.

big_lebowski2.jpgYou don’t &$%# with the Jesus!

Despite hav­ing only barely more than a cameo appear­ance, John Tur­turro nearly steals the movie with the unfor­get­table char­ac­ter Jesus Quin­tana (that’s “Jesus” with a hard “J”), a sex­ual preda­tor and cock­sure bowler. The Coens speak about want­ing to write a Latino char­ac­ter for Tur­turro, but where did the rest of his out­ra­geous char­ac­ter­i­za­tion come from? Did they just wind Tur­turro up and let him go? Other notable cameos include David Thewlis (Naked, Harry Pot­ter) as a gig­gling asso­ciate of Maude (Moore), and musi­cians Aimee Mann and Flea as hap­less nihilists.


Offi­cial movie site: www.biglebowskidvd.com

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Children of Men

Children of Men

 

Alfonso Cuarón’s Chil­dren of Men is absolutely one of the best movies I’ve ever seen. Two view­ings have over­whelmed me with some of the strongest emo­tional reac­tions I’ve ever had to a movie. It is, at the very least, one of the best of 2007 (along with Pan’s Labyrinth and United 93), and every­thing the similarly-themed V for Vendetta could have been.

Children of MenThis cof­fee packs a wallop

The movie opens nearly two decades after the last human birth. Mass infer­til­ity is a ter­ri­fy­ingly plau­si­ble sci-fi trope in 2008, with loom­ing cli­mate cat­a­stro­phe, increased rates of autism and aller­gies, and the immi­nent threat of a globe-spanning con­ta­gious dis­ease out­break like SARS (a fic­tional flu pan­demic is alluded to in the film). As the infer­til­ity remains uncured, so too is it unex­plained for the audi­ence. The best sci­ence fic­tion avoids pedes­trian pseudo-science that tends not to date well (2001: A Space Odyssey being the excep­tion that proves the rule). The most detail we learn is that women are infer­tile, and we can assume that cloning and arti­fi­cial insem­i­na­tion of frozen eggs have failed. So by the time the film opens, the harsh fact that the human race is doomed to slowly die out is a given, and has reduced the world’s soci­eties into chaos. Only Britain has been able to sur­vive, to a point, using only the harsh­est total­i­tar­ian meth­ods. In pro­pa­ganda com­mer­cials glimpsed through­out the movie, Britain con­grat­u­lates itself for the fas­cism that makes it pos­si­ble to carry on; but is this kind of sur­vival worth the price?

Immi­grants flood the only coun­try with some sem­blance of sta­bil­ity, flee­ing unspec­i­fied atroc­i­ties abroad. All we learn of the United States is of a vague cat­a­stro­phe in New York creep­ily referred to only as “it.” Immi­grants are demo­nized as “fugis” (for “fugi­tives,” per­haps pun­ning on the deroga­tory British slang “paki” for any and all Mid­dle East­ern­ers) and penned in con­cen­tra­tion camps. Many shots explic­itly allude to infa­mous images of cap­tive enemy com­bat­ants in Guan­tanamo Bay. Sev­eral of the fugi­tive voices we hear are Ger­man, caus­ing one to won­der just what exactly may have hap­pened in Ger­many, and if it may have been some­thing we have seen before in human his­tory. My Ger­man is non-existent, but If I’m not mis­taken, we over­hear one cap­tive Ger­man woman bit­terly com­plain to her guard for being locked up in a deten­tion cell with black peo­ple. It’s not a pretty pic­ture of human nature, that at the worst of times, the worst of us comes out.

Children of MenAt gun­point is one way to recon­nect with an ex

The five cred­ited screen­writ­ers, usu­ally a bad sign, have done an extra­or­di­nary job of adapt­ing the orig­i­nal novel by P.D. James (who, accord­ing to IMDB, has an uncred­ited cameo in the café bombed in the open­ing moments of the film). I don’t know if I would go so far as to say the movie is “bet­ter” than its source mate­r­ial, but it is cer­tainly more vis­ceral and emo­tion­ally affect­ing to a post 9/11 audi­ence. As an adap­ta­tion, the many changes are jus­ti­fied and ben­e­fit the trans­la­tion to a dif­fer­ent medium and time. Most sig­nif­i­cantly, the chronol­ogy is con­densed from months to days, and the rel­a­tively polite insur­rec­tion­ist group The Five Fish has become a full-fledged ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion called sim­ply The Fish. Theo (Clive Owen) is younger, and no longer liv­ing a life of wealthy ease. He’s a gam­bler and alco­holic, and his orig­i­nal moti­va­tion to help The Fish is raw money. His cousin Nigel (Danny Hus­ton) is not the all-powerful War­den of Eng­land of the book, but rather merely the effete guardian of the Ark of the Arts. King Crimson’s dra­matic Mel­lotron dirge “In the Court of the Crim­son King” fit­tingly accom­pa­nies Theo as he vis­its Nigel, pass­ing into a walled city that sep­a­rates the priv­i­leged élite from the work­ing masses out­side (Naomi Klein pre­dicts the future dom­i­nance of such places in the DVD bonus fea­tures). The Ark is a point­less quest to archive the world’s great works of art, includ­ing every­thing from Michelangelo’s David, Picasso’s Guer­nica, to Pink Floyd’s inflat­able pig.

Children of MenCry­ing babies don’t usu­ally have this effect on people

Sev­eral mind-bendingly impos­si­ble track­ing shots grace the film, so fluid and jus­ti­fied by the action that the mind barely reg­is­ters a lack of cut­ting. There is an incred­i­ble level of detail in the art direc­tion, but as Cuaron declares in the DVD bonus fea­tures, the goal to was be the “anti-Blade Run­ner.” Two decades hence, tech­nol­ogy has marched on only to a degree. What’s the point of inno­va­tion in fash­ion, auto­mo­biles, and con­sumer elec­tron­ics when the human race is doomed to extinc­tion? Eerie sights include fields of burn­ing cat­tle corpses (pos­si­bly due to mad cow dis­ease, or more likely the sim­ple fact that the farm­ing econ­omy has col­lapsed), aban­doned and crum­bling schools, and the promi­nence of dog rac­ing as the sport of choice in a world with fewer and fewer fit young peo­ple every day.

Children of MenThe Human Project is real

Chil­dren of Men may be a pun­ish­ingly bleak vision of the future, but there is hope to be had. Theo is a bro­ken man resolved to a slow death, both his own and of his species. But there is some­thing spe­cial within him; his for­mer lover Julian (Julianne Moore) trusts him over every­one else to do the right thing when pre­sented with a gift of hope: the first human child in two decades. Even ani­mals are drawn to him, includ­ing dogs, kit­tens, and deer. His friend Jasper (Michael Caine) praises the Hindu Peace Mantra, which also appears as an epi­gram after the cred­its (over the sound of chil­dren play­ing), and bears repeat­ing here:

Shan­tih Shan­tih Shantih

Offi­cial movie site: www.childrenofmen.net

Must view: Daily Film Dose’s Great­est Long Track­ing Shots in Cin­ema, includ­ing Chil­dren of Men.

Must view: a reel of fake adverts made for the film by For­eign Office Design (via Kottke.org)

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.