The Fall

The Fall movie poster

 

Tarsem Singh’s The Cell (2000) was one of the best-looking bad movies I’ve ever seen. It cer­tainly wasn’t helped by the pres­ence of Jen­nifer Lopez or the rou­tine ser­ial killer plot pos­si­bly meant to cap­i­tal­ize on the suc­cess of David Fincher’s Se7en (both hav­ing come from the same stu­dio, New Line Cin­ema). But it was trag­i­cally obvi­ous that Tarsem (as he is sim­ply known) was a wildly tal­ented visual styl­ist on a par with Terry Gilliam or Jean-Pierre Jeunet. So now, financed by his own money, in pro­duc­tion for over four years in 20 coun­tries, and pre­sented by Fincher and Spike Jonze, Tarsem gets a chance to tell one of his own sto­ries. He achieves a high level of spec­ta­cle with­out an osten­ta­tiously high bud­get. Apart from a scene in which tat­toos ink them­selves upon a man’s torso, there is lit­tle appar­ent CG. If there is any more, it’s good enough to be invis­i­ble. And one of the best sequences, a night­mar­ish surgery, is exe­cuted as stop motion ani­ma­tion like some­thing by The Broth­ers Quay.

Tarsem Singh The Fallinside the Grate­ful Dead t-shirt factory

The Fall opens in the after­math of a sur­real acci­dent: a horse is lifted by crane from a deep gully after hav­ing appar­ently fallen off a bridge. That we even­tu­ally learn that this strange scene is merely a Hol­ly­wood West­ern movie set does not lessen the enjoy­ably dream­like weird­ness of the imagery. The real theme of the movie is of the power of sto­ry­telling through the intense visu­al­iza­tion of movies, or even bet­ter, the imagination.

Amer­i­can stunt­man Roy (Lee Pace) recu­per­ates in a South­ern Cal­i­forn­ian hos­pi­tal. Alexan­dria (Cat­inca Untaru), a lit­tle girl mend­ing a bro­ken arm, attaches her­self to the bedrid­den mope. She had fallen from a tree while pick­ing fruit with her Indian immi­grant fam­ily in nearby orange groves, and now finds her­self alone in the strange hos­pi­tal, iso­lated not only by her age but also by the lan­guage bar­rier. She has never seen a movie and doesn’t really under­stand Roy’s job. But she is drawn to him, per­haps partly out of an inno­cent crush and partly out of her real­iza­tion he, like she, is unusu­ally imaginative.

Justine Waddell in The FallJus­tine Waddell’s fash­ions in The Fall will put your eye out

The slightly pudgy Untaru is a refresh­ing cast­ing choice for a child char­ac­ter, endear­ing but not cloy­ingly cute or espe­cially pre­co­cious. The phys­i­cally and emo­tion­ally trau­ma­tized Roy is bemused by her at first, and shortly finds him­self enter­tain­ing her with a seri­al­ized tale of epic derring-do. Roy’s fan­tas­tic adven­ture of the strug­gle between The Black Ban­dit against Gov­er­nor Odi­ous (Daniel Cal­t­a­girone) over the beau­ti­ful Eve­lyn (Jus­tine Wad­dell) becomes a movie-within-the-movie, visu­al­ized through the fil­ter of the girl’s mea­gre expe­ri­ences but rich imag­i­na­tion. When the Amer­i­can describes an “Indian,” she pic­tures a man from India, and his “squaw” is an Indian princess. She casts her ver­sion of the story with Roy and peo­ple from the hos­pi­tal. In the most Gilliam-esque image, the enemy knights resem­ble the hospital’s crudely armored X-Ray technicians.

Tarsem Singh The Fallour heroes wisely keep their distance

But it turns out Roy is a failed sui­cide case, heart­bro­ken over los­ing the love of a beau­ti­ful star­let. The acci­dent in the begin­ning of the film was his; both he and she are lit­er­ally fallen peo­ple. Like Gilliam’s The Adven­tures of Baron Mun­chausen (read The Dork Report review), the seem­ingly child-like tale he tells is shot through with dark under­cur­rents. Alexan­dria can just barely sense the pain embed­ded in the story, and is unequipped to truly grasp Roy’s deep anx­i­eties that love and life are doomed. Is he being cruel by telling her this story, or is he try­ing to teach her his grim life lessons?

The con­clu­sion has the feel of being tran­scen­dent and excit­ing, but lacks real punch. In a rapidly accel­er­at­ing crescendo of cut­ting and music, Roy and Alexan­dria heal (phys­i­cally and emo­tion­ally) and leave the hos­pi­tal. As she grows up, she imag­ines Roy exe­cut­ing every stunt in every movie she sees for the rest of her life. It’s incred­i­bly cal­lous of me as a viewer to sug­gest that the story might have taken such a turn, but just imag­ine the impact this sequence would have had if Roy had killed him­self after all… she would keep him alive for­ever in the movies in her head.


Offi­cial movie site: TheFallTheMovie.com/

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button movie poster

 

This Dork Reporter is slowly cool­ing on for­mer favorite David Fincher. His under­rated first fea­ture Alien3 is highly com­pro­mised, but eas­ily the next most the­mat­i­cally inter­est­ing entry in the Alien fran­chise (after, of course, Rid­ley Scott’s rich orig­i­nal). Se7en is one of the most gut-wrenchingly dis­turb­ing movies ever made, notable for hav­ing vir­tu­ally no vio­lence appear onscreen, despite its rep­u­ta­tion. Fight Club is per­haps the movie of the nineties, an eccen­tric blast of coun­ter­cul­tural fury. But almost every­thing that fol­lowed seemed a dis­ap­point­ment. The Game was wildly implau­si­ble with­out the pop and siz­zle that car­ried the sim­i­larly over-the-top Fight Club. Panic Room was an empty exer­cise in style, seem­ingly con­ceived solely for Fincher to exper­i­ment with new dig­i­tal tech­niques that would allow him to cre­ate impos­si­bly con­tin­u­ous cam­era moves through the walls and floors of a city brown­stone (and pos­si­bly also as another vehi­cle for star Jodie Foster’s per­sona as a sin­gle par­ent to be reck­oned with). Zodiac was highly praised both as a tight pro­ce­dural thriller and as a tour-de-force of still more bleeding-edge dig­i­tal spe­cial effects (so good that most view­ers wouldn’t sus­pect that many sequences were not tra­di­tion­ally shot in cam­era), but it did absolutely noth­ing for me. I’m won­der­ing if I missed some key aspect of it that would open it up to me — and that per­haps I should reap­praise it now that a director’s cut is avail­able on DVD.

Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonYou’re only as old as you feel

The advance mar­ket­ing for The Curi­ous Case of Ben­jamin But­ton excited me at first, but I was appre­hen­sive when I learned the screen­play (loosely based on a 1921 short story by F. Scott Fitzger­ald) was by Eric Roth, the writer of For­rest Gump. Indeed, it did turn out to be con­structed in a sim­i­lar vein and tone, even mim­ic­k­ing some of the corni­est devices of Gump: the famous dig­i­tal feather twirling in the wind has been replaced by an unlikely reap­pear­ing hum­ming­bird; Forrest’s mother’s apho­rism “life is like a box of choco­lates; you never know what you’re going to get” has its ana­log in the less mem­o­rable “you never know what’s com­ing for you”; even For­rest Gump’s parade of cameos by famous or infa­mous Amer­i­cans is here con­tin­ued with an appear­ance by Teddy Roo­sevelt. Against my will, this cutesi­ness did suc­ceed in draw­ing me in for most of its run­ning time. I was engrossed for much of it, but its leisurely three-hour run­ning time hon­estly strained my patience by about the two-hour mark.

Fincher and Roth relate the decades-long story via the fram­ing device of Benjamin’s (Brad Pitt) one true love Daisy (Cate Blanchett) on her deathbed, intro­duc­ing her adult daugh­ter Car­o­line (Julia Ormond) to her bio­log­i­cal father through a dra­matic read­ing of his diary, with gaps filled in from her own mem­ory. A soon-to-be infa­mous hur­ri­cane brews out­side the Louisiana hos­pi­tal room, shortly to erase much of Ben­jamin and Daisy’s milieu. The mul­ti­ple lay­ers of sto­ry­telling result is no less than three speak­ing voices to nar­rate the tale in voiceover. One fram­ing device too far?

Cate Blanchett in The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonCate Blanchett is a beau­ti­ful woman, but it’s eerie to see her appear to be in her 20s

The cen­tral con­ceit of the story is a fan­tas­ti­cally unfor­tu­nate dis­ease that afflicts one Ben­jamin But­ton. His body is born aged and decrepit, and ages back­wards while his mind matures nor­mally. As he aptly puts it when still a boy, he was “born old.” Tak­ing this story as any­thing other than a para­ble or fairy tale would be to miss the point, but the pho­to­re­al­is­tic spe­cial effects place the movie firmly in believ­able real­ity. So this viewer’s mind (when not dis­tracted by the high-tech visu­als) wan­dered into logis­tics. Some of the rules don’t seem to hold up: as a chrono­log­i­cal ado­les­cent, he man­i­fests the typ­i­cal sex­ual desires and self-centeredness. But his aged body strangely has the phys­i­cal fit­ness and stamina/potency to act them out (we see him preen­ing in front of a mir­ror, seem­ingly only aged from the neck up). Also, pre­sum­ably, Ben­jamin can be assured to die when his body regresses to infancy. So, given his phys­i­cal state at birth, is his death date pre-ordained? If he had been born with an infan­tilized body of a 20-year old, could he have been assured of only hav­ing two decades to live? Is he imper­vi­ous to harm? Indeed, he some­how man­ages to sur­vive being stepped on as a new­born, and later, is one of the few sur­vivors of a Ger­man sub­ma­rine attack on an out­classed tug­boat dur­ing World War II.

Ben­jamin is adopted by Quee­nie (Taraji P. Hen­son), an unfor­tu­nately stereo­typ­i­cal African Amer­i­can char­ac­ter, and spends his youth and old age (and vice versa!) at the nurs­ing home she man­ages. There, he meets his one true love Daisy, the niece of one of the ten­ants. Benjamin’s curi­ous con­di­tion pre­vents him from hav­ing any kind of nor­mal friend­ship or rela­tion­ship with her, so he leaves home to find his way in the world. He has his first seri­ous rela­tion­ship with Eliz­a­beth Abbott (Tilda Swin­ton), an older woman who thinks she’s younger than him (later, we learn that meet­ing him helped her change her life). Even­tu­ally, Ben­jamin and Daisy do meet at roughly the same phys­i­cal age and con­sum­mate their mutual love. When Daisy quite rightly asks Ben­jamin if he will still love her when she’s old and wrinkly, he jok­ingly turns it around and asks if she will still love him when he has acne. But what first amuses even­tu­ally comes back around to become one of the most painfully emo­tional sequences in the whole movie: Ben­jamin does after all regress into senil­ity (or per­haps even Alzheimer’s, before it was iden­ti­fied), trapped in the body of a pim­ply teenager. As always, the point is that the bell curve of a human life can be seen as a mir­ror image of itself: here, the impetu­ous­ness, aggres­sion, and mood swings of senil­ity are equated with the tumult of ado­les­cence. Like­wise, extreme youth and old age both are char­ac­ter­ized as the ulti­mate states of depen­dence and vulnerability.

Tilda Swinton in The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonTilda Swin­ton as Benjamin’s first lover, an older woman whom he allows to believe is younger

The spe­cial effects that allow an aged ver­sion of Pitt’s face to be super­im­posed over another, diminu­tive actor are light years in advance of the still-creepy dig­i­tal roto­scop­ing ani­ma­tion style used in Robert Zemeckis’ The Polar Express and Beowulf (although the lat­ter is an excel­lent film in spite of the inef­fec­tive effects). But no mat­ter how eerily fluid and seam­less the effects, I could not shake the feel­ing that I was watch­ing some­thing largely actu­al­ized by ani­ma­tors equipped with a giant com­puter server farm. These obvi­ously cut­ting edge tech­niques are more com­pre­hen­si­ble to me than what­ever the makeup and/or CG wiz­ards did to make 44-year-old Pitt and the 39 Blanchett appear to be in their smooth-skinned and limber-limbed 20s. Also, it must be said that an arti­fi­cially aged Pitt in his hypo­thet­i­cal 50s and 60s is a dead ringer for Robert Redford.

There must be some­thing in the bot­tled water film­mak­ers have been drink­ing recently, for I’ve noticed a decided trend towards movies about aging recently. Sarah Polley’s Away From Her (read The Dork Report review) and Tamara Jenkin’s The Sav­ages (read The Dork Report review) both look at the senil­ity than often comes at the end of life, and how it may affect the lives of those still liv­ing, for bet­ter or for worse. But another pair of movies dealt with mor­tal­ity and the fear of unfin­ished busi­ness through the lens of fan­tasy: Fran­cis Ford Coppola’s Youth With­out Youth (read The Dork Report review) and Char­lie Kaufman’s Synec­doche, New York (read The Dork Report review). All of these movies tap into most people’s fear of aging: not only of los­ing phys­i­cal health and thus inde­pen­dence, but also of the reli­a­bil­ity of one’s own mind.


Offi­cial movie site: www.benjaminbutton.com

Buy the Cri­te­rion Col­lec­tion Blu-ray or DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.