The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button movie poster

 

This Dork Reporter is slowly cool­ing on for­mer favorite David Fincher. His under­rated first fea­ture Alien3 is highly com­pro­mised, but eas­ily the next most the­mat­i­cally inter­est­ing entry in the Alien fran­chise (after, of course, Rid­ley Scott’s rich orig­i­nal). Se7en is one of the most gut-wrenchingly dis­turb­ing movies ever made, notable for hav­ing vir­tu­ally no vio­lence appear onscreen, despite its rep­u­ta­tion. Fight Club is per­haps the movie of the nineties, an eccen­tric blast of coun­ter­cul­tural fury. But almost every­thing that fol­lowed seemed a dis­ap­point­ment. The Game was wildly implau­si­ble with­out the pop and siz­zle that car­ried the sim­i­larly over-the-top Fight Club. Panic Room was an empty exer­cise in style, seem­ingly con­ceived solely for Fincher to exper­i­ment with new dig­i­tal tech­niques that would allow him to cre­ate impos­si­bly con­tin­u­ous cam­era moves through the walls and floors of a city brown­stone (and pos­si­bly also as another vehi­cle for star Jodie Foster’s per­sona as a sin­gle par­ent to be reck­oned with). Zodiac was highly praised both as a tight pro­ce­dural thriller and as a tour-de-force of still more bleeding-edge dig­i­tal spe­cial effects (so good that most view­ers wouldn’t sus­pect that many sequences were not tra­di­tion­ally shot in cam­era), but it did absolutely noth­ing for me. I’m won­der­ing if I missed some key aspect of it that would open it up to me — and that per­haps I should reap­praise it now that a director’s cut is avail­able on DVD.

Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonYou’re only as old as you feel

The advance mar­ket­ing for The Curi­ous Case of Ben­jamin But­ton excited me at first, but I was appre­hen­sive when I learned the screen­play (loosely based on a 1921 short story by F. Scott Fitzger­ald) was by Eric Roth, the writer of For­rest Gump. Indeed, it did turn out to be con­structed in a sim­i­lar vein and tone, even mim­ic­k­ing some of the corni­est devices of Gump: the famous dig­i­tal feather twirling in the wind has been replaced by an unlikely reap­pear­ing hum­ming­bird; Forrest’s mother’s apho­rism “life is like a box of choco­lates; you never know what you’re going to get” has its ana­log in the less mem­o­rable “you never know what’s com­ing for you”; even For­rest Gump’s parade of cameos by famous or infa­mous Amer­i­cans is here con­tin­ued with an appear­ance by Teddy Roo­sevelt. Against my will, this cutesi­ness did suc­ceed in draw­ing me in for most of its run­ning time. I was engrossed for much of it, but its leisurely three-hour run­ning time hon­estly strained my patience by about the two-hour mark.

Fincher and Roth relate the decades-long story via the fram­ing device of Benjamin’s (Brad Pitt) one true love Daisy (Cate Blanchett) on her deathbed, intro­duc­ing her adult daugh­ter Car­o­line (Julia Ormond) to her bio­log­i­cal father through a dra­matic read­ing of his diary, with gaps filled in from her own mem­ory. A soon-to-be infa­mous hur­ri­cane brews out­side the Louisiana hos­pi­tal room, shortly to erase much of Ben­jamin and Daisy’s milieu. The mul­ti­ple lay­ers of sto­ry­telling result is no less than three speak­ing voices to nar­rate the tale in voiceover. One fram­ing device too far?

Cate Blanchett in The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonCate Blanchett is a beau­ti­ful woman, but it’s eerie to see her appear to be in her 20s

The cen­tral con­ceit of the story is a fan­tas­ti­cally unfor­tu­nate dis­ease that afflicts one Ben­jamin But­ton. His body is born aged and decrepit, and ages back­wards while his mind matures nor­mally. As he aptly puts it when still a boy, he was “born old.” Tak­ing this story as any­thing other than a para­ble or fairy tale would be to miss the point, but the pho­to­re­al­is­tic spe­cial effects place the movie firmly in believ­able real­ity. So this viewer’s mind (when not dis­tracted by the high-tech visu­als) wan­dered into logis­tics. Some of the rules don’t seem to hold up: as a chrono­log­i­cal ado­les­cent, he man­i­fests the typ­i­cal sex­ual desires and self-centeredness. But his aged body strangely has the phys­i­cal fit­ness and stamina/potency to act them out (we see him preen­ing in front of a mir­ror, seem­ingly only aged from the neck up). Also, pre­sum­ably, Ben­jamin can be assured to die when his body regresses to infancy. So, given his phys­i­cal state at birth, is his death date pre-ordained? If he had been born with an infan­tilized body of a 20-year old, could he have been assured of only hav­ing two decades to live? Is he imper­vi­ous to harm? Indeed, he some­how man­ages to sur­vive being stepped on as a new­born, and later, is one of the few sur­vivors of a Ger­man sub­ma­rine attack on an out­classed tug­boat dur­ing World War II.

Ben­jamin is adopted by Quee­nie (Taraji P. Hen­son), an unfor­tu­nately stereo­typ­i­cal African Amer­i­can char­ac­ter, and spends his youth and old age (and vice versa!) at the nurs­ing home she man­ages. There, he meets his one true love Daisy, the niece of one of the ten­ants. Benjamin’s curi­ous con­di­tion pre­vents him from hav­ing any kind of nor­mal friend­ship or rela­tion­ship with her, so he leaves home to find his way in the world. He has his first seri­ous rela­tion­ship with Eliz­a­beth Abbott (Tilda Swin­ton), an older woman who thinks she’s younger than him (later, we learn that meet­ing him helped her change her life). Even­tu­ally, Ben­jamin and Daisy do meet at roughly the same phys­i­cal age and con­sum­mate their mutual love. When Daisy quite rightly asks Ben­jamin if he will still love her when she’s old and wrinkly, he jok­ingly turns it around and asks if she will still love him when he has acne. But what first amuses even­tu­ally comes back around to become one of the most painfully emo­tional sequences in the whole movie: Ben­jamin does after all regress into senil­ity (or per­haps even Alzheimer’s, before it was iden­ti­fied), trapped in the body of a pim­ply teenager. As always, the point is that the bell curve of a human life can be seen as a mir­ror image of itself: here, the impetu­ous­ness, aggres­sion, and mood swings of senil­ity are equated with the tumult of ado­les­cence. Like­wise, extreme youth and old age both are char­ac­ter­ized as the ulti­mate states of depen­dence and vulnerability.

Tilda Swinton in The Curious Case of Benjamin ButtonTilda Swin­ton as Benjamin’s first lover, an older woman whom he allows to believe is younger

The spe­cial effects that allow an aged ver­sion of Pitt’s face to be super­im­posed over another, diminu­tive actor are light years in advance of the still-creepy dig­i­tal roto­scop­ing ani­ma­tion style used in Robert Zemeckis’ The Polar Express and Beowulf (although the lat­ter is an excel­lent film in spite of the inef­fec­tive effects). But no mat­ter how eerily fluid and seam­less the effects, I could not shake the feel­ing that I was watch­ing some­thing largely actu­al­ized by ani­ma­tors equipped with a giant com­puter server farm. These obvi­ously cut­ting edge tech­niques are more com­pre­hen­si­ble to me than what­ever the makeup and/or CG wiz­ards did to make 44-year-old Pitt and the 39 Blanchett appear to be in their smooth-skinned and limber-limbed 20s. Also, it must be said that an arti­fi­cially aged Pitt in his hypo­thet­i­cal 50s and 60s is a dead ringer for Robert Redford.

There must be some­thing in the bot­tled water film­mak­ers have been drink­ing recently, for I’ve noticed a decided trend towards movies about aging recently. Sarah Polley’s Away From Her (read The Dork Report review) and Tamara Jenkin’s The Sav­ages (read The Dork Report review) both look at the senil­ity than often comes at the end of life, and how it may affect the lives of those still liv­ing, for bet­ter or for worse. But another pair of movies dealt with mor­tal­ity and the fear of unfin­ished busi­ness through the lens of fan­tasy: Fran­cis Ford Coppola’s Youth With­out Youth (read The Dork Report review) and Char­lie Kaufman’s Synec­doche, New York (read The Dork Report review). All of these movies tap into most people’s fear of aging: not only of los­ing phys­i­cal health and thus inde­pen­dence, but also of the reli­a­bil­ity of one’s own mind.


Offi­cial movie site: www.benjaminbutton.com

Buy the Cri­te­rion Col­lec­tion Blu-ray or DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

 

Indi­ana Jones and the King­dom of the Crys­tal Skull is ulti­mately a lit­tle dis­ap­point­ing, espe­cially if one reflects too much on its plot and basic plau­si­bil­ity, but it has plenty to com­mend it. It is also far from the worst entry in the fran­chise (that would be Tem­ple of Doom — blech! stay tuned for The Dork Report’s forth­com­ing tear­down of that stinky turd), which admit­tedly isn’t say­ing much.

The basic con­cept (report­edly con­ceived by pro­ducer George Lucas and viewed askance at by direc­tor Steven Spiel­berg and star Har­ri­son Ford) is sound. The orig­i­nal tril­ogy was set in the 1930s, and as such the first and third films mostly con­cerned Indy bat­tling the Ratzis. So, whom bet­ter for an older Indi­ana Jones to face off against in the 1950s than Com­mies and UFOs? In all seri­ous­ness, sounds like fun to me! Unfor­tu­nately, the end result is mud­dled with bits of busi­ness about El Dorado, and sad­dled with a dis­ap­point­ingly con­ser­v­a­tive tsk-tsk dis­ap­proval of the ras­cally Indy’s way­ward ways with women. But per­haps the focus on mar­riage and the restora­tion of a bro­ken nuclear fam­ily was also a con­scious allu­sion to the con­formist 1950s?

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal SkullVee haff vays of mak­ing you talk

Cate Blanchett is far and away the best thing in it, but then again, she usu­ally is. Impos­si­bly sexy in a severe bob hair­cut and out­ra­geous accent (the sub­ject of Indy’s best gag: “Well, judg­ing by the way you’re swal­low­ing your wub­b­ley­ous, I’m guess­ing Russ­ian”), Blanchett can take a line as bor­ing as “Take the thing and put it in the car” (I’m para­phras­ing) and steal the scene with it. How­ever, this Dork Reporter is puz­zled by the ubiq­uity of sud­den A-lister Shia LeBeouf. He is not espe­cially hand­some, funny, charis­matic, or even a skilled action per­former. But Stephen Spiel­berg seems to have a man-crush on him, so here he is. Let’s hope saner heads pre­vail and don’t make him the star of future sequels. There can only be one Young Indi­ana Jones; River Phoenix, we miss you. It’s a treat to have Karen Allen back at last. Unfor­tu­nately, there’s no John Rhys-Davies or Sean Con­nery to be had, but in a pinch, Ray Win­stone will do fine.

Of course mod­ern action movies get com­pared to video games all the time (often deri­sively, mostly deserv­ingly), but The King­dom of the Crys­tal Skull is one of the most overt offend­ers I’ve seen yet. Sequences like the one in which the gang must solve puz­zles like rac­ing down a spi­ral stair­case as the steps retract and the ground falls away will no doubt trans­late more or less intact into the film’s offi­cial game.

The biggest clas­sic Indy theme miss­ing from Skull is that of reli­gion. In the first film, Indy tracked down the honest-to-Moses Ark of the Con­venant. The MacGuf­fin of the sec­ond film was a set of Hindu (well, a deroga­to­rily fic­tion­al­ized ver­sion thereof) sacred stones. The third install­ment went back to the franchise’s Judeo-Christian roots and had Indy pur­sue none other than The Holy Grail. Indy some­times dis­misses reli­gious tra­di­tions as myth, but usu­ally doesn’t have any trou­ble accept­ing that the 10 Com­mand­ment tablets and the Grail are any­thing less than actual objects. There are no mere metaphors for Indi­ana Jones!

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal SkullYou never intro­duced me to your father!

In keep­ing with the reli­gious over­tones, all three parts of the orig­i­nal tril­ogy end in psy­che­delic freak­outs: wit­ness an empty Ark explode Nazi heads, sacred stones mag­i­cally relieve a village’s famine, and a Grail cause an earth­quake. So as much as I may have hated Skull’s mys­ti­fy­ing, CG-drenched in which a bunch of alien corpses become one liv­ing being that does some­thing glowy to Irina Spalko and launches his space­ship off into another dimen­sion (all of which is like an unholy love child of the X-Files fea­ture film Fight the Future and Spielberg’s own A.I.: Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence), it is actu­ally in keep­ing with the end­ings of the orig­i­nal three films (even the “good one,” of course, Raiders). If you don’t believe me, go back and watch them again.

Must read: Rod Hilton’s hilar­i­ous, cut­ting The Abridged Script.


Offi­cial movie site: www.indianajones.com


I’m Not There

I'm Not There

 

This Dork Reporter always finds it inter­est­ing to pon­der his pre­con­ceived notions of a movie once he has seen it. The mar­ket­ing and buzz on I’m Not There mostly cen­tered on two talk­ing points: the quirky device of mul­ti­ple actors all play­ing incar­na­tions of Bob Dylan, and Cate Blanchett being just plain amaz­ing as usual (what else is new?). The first point is what gave me pause: how much sense would this film make to some­one who is not a Dylan fan and scholar?

All I really know about Dylan comes from the Mar­tin Scors­ese doc­u­men­tary No Direc­tion Home, and even that paints a sketchy pic­ture of the man. Dylan has been an enigma through­out his long his­tory in the pub­lic eye, often speak­ing in rid­dles, and (at least in his early years) invent­ing a fic­tional back­story. The press and even his own pay­ing audi­ences were often openly antag­o­nis­tic, so it’s no won­der he was so famously com­bat­ive and eva­sive. Pre­fig­ur­ing the modern-day chameleons David Bowie and Madonna, Dylan pre­sented a series of per­sonas: Amer­i­can roots folkie, polit­i­cal agi­ta­tor, rock ‘n’ roller, born-again Chris­t­ian, Hol­ly­wood actor, and so on. The ques­tion being: how much of this evo­lu­tion was sin­cere growth and change, and how much was per­for­mance art? Who is “Bob Dylan”?

I'm Not ThereAn Oscar nomination’s a-gonna fall

Direc­tor and co-screenwriter Todd Haynes, hav­ing already decon­structed David Bowie in Vel­vet Gold­mine, tack­les the many aspects of Dylan per­haps the only way pos­si­ble: frac­ture his key facets into mul­ti­ple char­ac­ters. As with the Bowie ana­logue Brian Slade in Vel­vet Gold­mine, none of the Dylan fig­ures are actu­ally named Dylan, but then again nei­ther is Dylan him­self, whose actual sur­name is Zim­mer­man. Chris­t­ian Bale plays Jack Rollins, inter­pret­ing Dylan’s Chris­t­ian period, and Richard Gere plays Billy the Kid, a pretty lit­eral inter­pre­ta­tion of Dylan’s years in the wilder­ness after his fame peaked for the first time. Adding an extra layer of post­mod­ern com­plex­ity, the late Heath Ledger plays Rob­bie Clark, a film actor famous for play­ing one of the fic­tional Dylans in a biopic. And of course, Cate Blanchett is amaz­ing. As Jude Quinn, a reluc­tant celebrity fend­ing off the attacks of the press, she tri­umphs by avoid­ing mere impres­sion. Sure, she’s wear­ing a fright wig and shades, but her expres­sions and body lan­guage cap­ture Dylan’s para­dox­i­cally wordy elusiveness.

The result is part faux doc­u­men­tary, part fic­tion, but pro­vides a truer over­all pic­ture of Dylan’s com­pli­cated char­ac­ter than a mere biopic ever could. Per­haps at some point after his death (may that be a long time from now), we will see a con­ven­tional musi­cal biopic made of his life story (à la Bird, Ray, or Walk the Line), but I cer­tainly hope crit­ics and audi­ences will remem­ber I’m Not There.

I'm Not ThereHey mr. gui­tar man

The DVD edi­tion is the only I can think of that incor­po­rates long on-screen text intro­duc­tions (more than one, in fact). Does this reflect a lack of con­fi­dence on the part of the film­mak­ers or dis­trib­u­tors in the home view­ers being able to com­pre­hend the film, or is it more in the vein of the schol­arly intro­duc­tions that pref­ace Pen­guin Clas­sics vol­umes? Either way, it only rein­forces the impres­sion that you have to be a Dylan scholar to appre­ci­ate the film (which, inci­den­tally, turned out to not be the case).

And finally, I detected a few ref­er­ences to direc­tor Richard Lester: Rob­bie Clark (Ledger) walks through the set of the 1968 film Petu­lia, dur­ing an early scene in which women in neck braces leave a freight ele­va­tor before a party to pro­mote high­way safety (attended by the likes of George C. Scott, Julie Christie, and the Grate­ful Dead, so it’s not at all unlikely Dylan could have been there too). But even bet­ter is the best Bea­t­les trib­ute I’ve ever seen: the Fab Four breeze through as the epit­ome of care­free fun, lit­er­ally speak­ing and mov­ing in fast-motion. They tempt Jude Quinn’s (Blanchett) desire to escape, until they are chased away by A Hard Day’s Night’s scream­ing sycophants.


Offi­cial movie site: www.imnotthere-movie.com

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to The Dork Report.


Elizabeth: The Golden Age

Elizabeth the Golden Age movie poster

 

I’ll have to gang up with the gen­eral crit­i­cal con­sen­sus around Eliz­a­beth: The Golden Age, best summed up as: Cate Blanchett is astound­ing, as usual (yawn — the Acad­emy Award nom­i­na­tion was vir­tu­ally assured before the cam­eras rolled), but the movie is a dis­ap­point­ing sequel to a pow­er­ful original.

Oh, and did I men­tion that Cate is great? Oh yeah, you don’t need me to say that.

Cate Blanchette in Elizabeth the Golden AgeCate is great; what else is new?

The cin­e­matog­ra­phy is lovely but the edit­ing a lit­tle choppy for a time­line that spans so much time. The stag­ing is some­what less than epic; even large CG set pieces like the Pirates of the Caribbean–style sea bat­tle between the Eng­lish and Span­ish armadas seem under-staffed by back­ground actors. A typ­i­cal line of dia­log, quot­ing from mem­ory, is the dash­ing Sir Wal­ter Raleigh killing two cliches with one stone with a humdinger like “We’re only human; we do what we can.”

Clive Owen as Sir Walter Raleigh in Elizabeth the Golden AgeSir Wal­ter Raleigh sails away from the Kraken

Erm, that’s about it. I’ll try to think of some­thing smarter to say about the next one.


Offi­cial movie site: www.elizabeththegoldenage.net

Buy the DVD from Ama­zon and kick back a few pen­nies to me.