King Kong (1933)
Well, it gets points for being so drenched with subtext you can swim in it. But whenever Kong isn’t on screen it’s dreadful.
Related Posts:
Written by Chad Ossman
Well, it gets points for being so drenched with subtext you can swim in it. But whenever Kong isn’t on screen it’s dreadful.
Written by Chad Ossman
December 15th, 2005 at 11:49 am
Peter Jackson is perfectly capable of making the greatest version of King Kong possible, and, for all I plan on knowing, he did. But in the end, it’s still a movie about a big fucking monkey, and I just can’t find it in me to care.
December 15th, 2005 at 11:50 am
Oh, hang on, you’re not talking about the new one. Ummm. Hi! I like the tweaks in site design!
July 1st, 2008 at 11:25 pm
[...] as a giant green petulant baby (which is both absurdly funny and oddly moving, like the original King Kong). I still maintain it is one of the most brilliantly edited films I’ve ever seen, the closest [...]