I Heart Katamari

Best. Game. Ever.

To give that state­ment a lit­tle con­text: I’m a novice gamer at best. My cruel, heart­less, Dick­en­sian par­ents wouldn’t let me have an Atari grow­ing up (kid­ding, Mom & Dad! I’m the bet­ter for it) so I’m a late­comer to all this beep­ing, flash­ing, vibrat­ing ana­log joy­stick­ing stuff. A few years ago, I was engrossed in The Matrix films to a degree that seems silly now. But at the time, I was design­ing the offi­cial shop so I can explain away my obses­sion as hav­ing arisen from spend­ing all day every day Pho­to­shop­ping dis­tressed metal boxes with glow­ing green screens. Word was that the Enter the Matrix Playsta­tion game was a ver­i­ta­ble rev­o­lu­tion in gam­ing, an unprece­dented merg­ing of cin­ema and inter­ac­tiv­ity, nec­es­sary to under­stand the upcom­ing sequels, yadda yadda yadda. Sucker that I am, I actu­ally bought a Playsta­tion 2 on the strength of this hearsay, and… the game sucked. I had never even touched a PS2 before and I could tell that it sucked.

Worse than that, it was unbe­liev­ably vio­lent. Before you call me naïve for think­ing it wouldn’t be: My favorite of the Matrix series is No. 2 (yes I know that’s against pop­u­lar opin­ion, but what does Pop­u­lar know?). If you watch closely, you’ll notice that although our osten­si­ble heroes Neo and Trin­ity mow down dozens of inno­cent humans (not, tech­ni­cally, their bod­ies, but their con­scious­nesses in the Matrix, result­ing in their real-world bod­ies dying) with machine guns in the first film, not a sin­gle liv­ing per­son dies in the sec­ond. Unfor­tu­nately the game takes after the first film and the player’s very first task is to sneak into a post office and kill as many armed guards as possible.

Where to start? First, is it inten­tional irony that you’re going postal on poor USPS work­ers? Sec­ond, why in the hell are they all pack­ing heat, as opposed to pack­ing tape? I for­got to men­tion that you start out the game unarmed, and the included instruction/hint book help­fully sug­gests a com­pli­cated combo move (or what­ever gamers call it… you have to move the joy­stick up and to the left, press a dozen but­tons in a com­plex sequence, turn around three times and toss salt over your shoul­der) to sneak up on some­body and break their neck.

Now let me say here that I am against cen­sor­ship in all forms, and all the talk about ban­ning or even cre­at­ing a rat­ing sys­tem for vio­lent videogames sets off all my lib­eral alarms. But when a game like this actu­ally encour­ages the player to sneak up on an inno­cent human being just doing his job (as opposed to a non-sentient but mali­cious com­puter pro­gram, as the Matrix mythos call a vil­lain) and break his neck instead of con­fronting them head-on and poten­tially cost­ing you health points in a fist-fight… well, I nearly had the urge to call my rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Congress.

So my Playsta­tion gath­ered dust for a good long while. I would occa­sion­ally take a stab at other games, but wound up sell­ing most of them back. I did enjoy one quite a lot: The Simp­sons Hit & Run, a sort of Grand Theft Auto (or so I’m told) with­out the hook­ers and whack­ing and stuff. Great fun! Seri­ously, you should try it.

But then I read about Kata­mari Damacy in Time Mag­a­zine, and was intrigued. Partly that the media would focus on a game for any rea­son other than to decry its poi­son­ing our nation’s children’s pre­cious bod­ily flu­ids, but also by it sound­ing totally unique. And it is, as far as I know. Basi­cally, you roll a big sticky ball around the place and pick things up. The big­ger your clump gets, the big­ger things you can pick up. Soon it becomes clear that if you play long enough, every­thing around you is pick-uppable, includ­ing peo­ple, sky­scrap­ers, and even clouds. It’s insane! Totally weird! Addictive!

I just picked up the sequel We Love Kata­mari this week­end and have fallen in love all over again. I wouldn’t say it’s a huge con­cep­tual advance over the orig­i­nal, but there are many more worlds to explore, more com­plex goals, and more gen­eral loony­ness all around. Yay! I’m a gamer!

Spam Poem No. 2: “250 Ways to Thank You”

The sec­ond in a series of found poetry taken from spam sub­jects. I’m tak­ing a dif­fer­ent tack this time, avoid­ing the more absur­dist lines that appear in No. 1 “Here we come!” (there’s plenty more of that wait­ing for No. 3) and aim­ing instead for a coher­ent nar­ra­tive flow.

250 Ways to Thank You

Don’t tell any­one please
about celebration

Are you ignor­ing me?
do you care?
is it funny?
It’s not a joke

I’ve Got a solu­tion for you
good idea
if you need it
here you go

The Great Exper­i­ment
some­thing unusual
nice gift for every­one
Get what you need

Don’t feel bad
You have been selected
Let’s meet up again soon
one more time

My Eyes Bleed

After an entire sum­mer of no TV at all (Net­flix, like Ben & Jerry’s, doesn’t count), I watched three hours in a row tonight and my eyes are still uncross­ing. Every­body knows the old saw about tele­vi­sion being the opi­ate of the masses (opium must flour­ish in vast waste­lands). But when exactly did TV’s drug metaphor of choice change to crack?

Lost

Gone are the days of The A-Team, where one could switch on any ran­dom episode and know imme­di­ately what’s going on. Lost, like kissing-cousin action/dramas Alias and 24, depends at least as much on plot con­ti­nu­ity as char­ac­ter devel­op­ment. Not coin­ci­den­tally, these are the only three shows I watch. I’m pass­ing on 24 this year, because no mat­ter how excit­ing the plot­ting, the pol­i­tics became too unpalat­able for me (the over­ar­ch­ing theme of the entire last sea­son boils down to the fol­low­ing: tor­ture is a great tool for fight­ing ter­ror­ism. OK… I might lis­ten to such an argu­ment… if our inept intel­li­gence com­mu­nity ever man­ages to catch a ter­ror­ist BEFORE strik­ing! Please, give me a break. And mak­ing fun of Amnesty Inter­na­tional was just wrong. Can you tell I’m angry?). I’ve yet to decide if I’m going to com­mit to another whole year of Alias. No mat­ter how sexy Lena Olin is, the show has lost its fun plot-driven nature and con­verted into a more typ­i­cal wing-it-week-by-week for­mat. So that leaves Lost, the only one of the three about which I’ve actu­ally been impa­tient all summer.

Like any good drug, with every­thing Lost gives, it only demands more. The addic­tive nature of the show is to eke out infor­ma­tion in tiny lit­tle dime­bags… I mean, pieces. So I’ve waited all sum­mer for the answer to count­less ques­tions, at least one of which was “answered” tonight. I put that in scare quotes because all it did was metas­ta­size the num­ber of ques­tions to absurd pro­por­tions. But dis­ap­point­ingly, I found it a bit of a cheat to dis­cover the con­tents of the hatch to be a new char­ac­ter intro­duced just 5 min­utes before. Where’s the sus­pense in that? Imag­ine if it had been Jack’s father or fiancé instead. Wouldn’t you just have jumped out of your chair? OK, maybe just junkies like me.

To add a lit­tle spice to the evening, the local ABC news affil­i­ate broke in repeat­edly to keep us informed on a Jet Blue plane mak­ing an emer­gency land­ing with its land­ing gear twisted side­ways. Would they have been so mor­bidly enthu­si­as­tic about the story if Lost wasn’t about the sur­vivors of a plane crash? And just to top all the breath­less action off, we’re treated to a Jet Blue com­mer­cial! Oops… awk­ward! (Aside: my friend Dave help­fully sug­gested they should sim­ply land side­ways. Thanks Dave!)

Inva­sion

Uh… so? In short, this one did noth­ing for me. I guess they fig­ured keep­ing “of the Body Snatch­ers” in the title added up to too many syllables.

On Neil Gaiman and Becoming an Idiot at Book Signings

Neil Gaiman

I went to the Neil Gaiman read­ing & sign­ing at Barnes & Noble here in New York City tonight. Even though I knew he’s about as much of a rock star as a writer can get, I naively didn’t get in line until after he fin­ished speak­ing. Neil hero­ically pledged to stay as long as it took; B&N like­wise promised to stay open (would they do that for, say Salman Rushdie?). A slow real­iza­tion set in that I would have to hun­ker down for sev­eral hours to get my book signed. Turns out I had the whole night free (which is a sub­ject for another time), so I thought what the heck? I have to sit some­where to read the book, why not here and now?

And so the first hour passes. The Farts & Igno­ble car­pet­ing is some­what less than plush and my rear is a bit sore. But sal­va­tion! An employee offers us wrist­bands free­ing us to leave and return at will. Well, at will until 8:45, that is. So I go have an enor­mous burger and fries (a crav­ing, what can I say?) and come back.

Neil (he of the super­hu­man wrist) has already signed a hun­dred or so copies; I could sim­ply buy one and call it a night. So the whole time I’m think­ing, why am I doing this? I’m 31 years old! Not an 18-year-old goth chick or a pony­tailed middle-aged book dealer look­ing to make a killing on eBay. I don’t even have any­thing clever to say or ask him!

Turns out I’m saved any awk­ward­ness around Neil by the woman in front of me. She had a whole spiel pre­pared, thank­ing him for turn­ing her on to sev­eral other writ­ers. On one hand, I’m pri­vately embar­rassed for not hav­ing read a thing by any of those men­tioned, but on the other, it frees me from the pres­sure of strik­ing any kind of rap­port with him myself. So as he signed my book and a first-edition Sand­man hard­cover I had brought along (I’m such a nerd), I sim­ply thanked him for stick­ing it out. He replied that it’s quite easy when every­body is so nice. Poor fel­low looked exhausted, stand­ing just to keep his cir­cu­la­tion mov­ing, but he remained pleas­ant to the end.

I’m inspired to recount a few other sign­ings I’ve attended here in New York:

Sarah Vow­ell

I have a lit­tle bit of a crush on Sarah Vow­ell. Brains and wit (prefer­ably snarky and tart) always turn me on, and it must be said she looked a bit sexy that evening. At the post-reading sign­ing, I asked for it to be inscribed to “Chad.” She looked a bit curi­ous and asked me to repeat it. So I did and man­aged to say some­thing about how she had resisted the oppor­tu­nity to make a dim­pled or hang­ing chad joke. I can’t remem­ber what she said in reply, because she looked me straight in the eye and held it for a moment or two, smil­ing her lit­tle curlicue smile. Whew! Maybe she sim­ply didn’t hear my name the first time, but I’ll cer­tainly remem­ber that look and will con­tinue to enter­tain the fan­tasy that she doesn’t look at every­body like that.

Dave Sim & Gerhard

The writer/artists of the comic book Cere­bus. This was maybe 1998 or so, and I think I had already stopped read­ing Cere­bus; no mat­ter how bril­liant a comics writer/artist Sim may be, I couldn’t deal with his sex­ual pol­i­tics (in short, he started using Cere­bus to expli­cate his increas­ingly para­noid and hos­tile feel­ings towards women — yes, all women. Per­son­ally, I like women a lot). But I found out he was going to be show­ing some orig­i­nal art and sign­ing at a gallery in Tribeca, and decided to go. The orga­niz­ers really laid down the law: Mr. Sim and Mr. Ger­hard will sign only, and not do any sketches. Nev­er­the­less, peo­ple were being quite rude and demand­ing mul­ti­ple sketches on their stacks of Cere­bus books any­way, and I recall the gen­eral atmos­phere being a bit neg­a­tive. So when I came up, all I had was a sin­gle slim issue of Cere­bus and didn’t ask for any­thing. And he sketched a Cere­bus head by his name. How about that? The tetchy misog­y­nist drew me a cute lit­tle cartoon!

Ray Brad­bury

This is a good story. Brad­bury is quite a char­ac­ter; imag­ine a huge red-nosed stone-deaf Santa Claus out of uni­form and you’ll get the gen­eral idea. Amus­ingly, an assis­tant stood by loudly repeat­ing in his ear every­thing peo­ple said to him. A film stu­dent at the time, I asked him if he had ever con­sid­ered pub­lish­ing his Moby Dick screen­play. After a brief delay as my ques­tion was relayed to him at greater vol­ume and prox­im­ity, he rose up and bel­lowed (the­atri­cally out­raged) “OF COURSE NOT!!! When I was a BOY in ILLINOIS, I peeked behind the CURTAINS at the CARNIVAL and had my INNOCENCE SULLIED! Movies are MAGIC, and read­ing a screen­play is like learn­ing how a MAGICIAN does his TRICKS!” (etc… I’m para­phras­ing) I stam­mered some­thing about how I was a screen­writ­ing stu­dent and I only wanted to read it. His assis­tant mer­ci­fully repeated me, and then Brad­bury just as abruptly changed tack: “OH! That’s DIFFERENT!” and pro­ceeded to say some­thing about how a writer can learn a lot by read­ing as much as pos­si­ble. So I can proudly state I’ve been pub­licly and loudly dressed down by no less than Ray Brad­bury, but nonethe­less man­aged to save face.

Tarnation

Tarnation movie poster

 

God, I want to jump out a win­dow. I sand­wiched a movie as innocu­ous as Willy Wonka inbe­tween this recent run of major movie bum­mers: Tar­na­tion, Kurt & Court­ney, Sid & Nancy, 11’09“01, Down­fall… but it didn’t amount to much more than a breather. Let’s see… are there any Care Bear DVDs on Net­flix I can use to bal­ance out the movies I’ve been watch­ing recently that fea­ture grief, despair, holo­caust, addic­tion, abuse, and terrorism?

Sid & Nancy

Sid and Nancy movie poster

 

And now to raise the gan­der of another friend. Sorry, Kevin, but I’m still not much of an Alex Cox fan and found this one a lit­tle hard to digest.

But no doubt, Gary Old­man is superb (the degree to which he dis­ap­pears into roles is actu­ally a bit scary — did any­body besides me not even rec­og­nize him in Han­ni­bal and The Con­tender until the end cred­its rolled?). And some of the dia­logue is choice: “What’s hap­pened to Jonny?” “Johnny got beat up by fascists.”

Maybe like Kurt & Court­ney, my Punk Appre­ci­a­tion Defi­ciency Syn­drome col­ored my response the film.

11’09“01 — September 11

11'09

 

A series of short films inspired by or in reac­tion to 9/11 made by direc­tors from nearly every continent.

At first, I thought for sure I would be giv­ing this one more than three stars, but the qual­ity of the short films takes a steep dive after the first two. The first in par­tic­u­lar, by Iran­ian film­maker Samira Makhmal­baf, is excel­lent. It opens on an entire Afghanistan vil­lage emp­ty­ing their well in order to man­u­fac­ture bricks to build shel­ters for when the US will bomb them. A female school­teacher rounds up all the chil­dren and attempts to explain to them what hap­pened in New York, and why the Amer­i­cans are about to kill them. Step one: try to illus­trate the con­cept of a skyscraper.

The short from Egypt is quite bad, and almost laugh­able (dig the ghost of a buff Amer­i­can Marine killed in Beruit, walk­ing out of the ocean, soak­ing wet and top­less). And unfor­tu­nately, Sean Penn’s con­tri­bu­tion was over-edited into obliv­ion. But a late high point is Ken Loach’s doc­u­men­tary about the US-instigated over­throw of Chile’s democratically-elected gov­ern­ment on… wait for it… Sep­tem­ber 11, 1973!

And a bit of trivia: Mira Nair’s short was writ­ten by an old room­mate I had back in film school.

Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory

Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory movie poster

 

Ever know you’ve seen a movie, but can’t really remem­ber it? So after see­ing the Tim Bur­ton remake, I decided to put the orig­i­nal on my Net­flix queue because I just couldn’t spark the brain cells that con­tained my rec­ol­lec­tions of it.

This is the first of two posts that are bound to upset friends… this one will surely hurt the feel­ings of H the Mean Teacher. First I come down hard on Nir­vana, and now I am ambiva­lent about one of her favorite movies! For that I’m sorry, but I think I can mit­i­gate the dam­age by briefly explain­ing my rat­ing system.

In a word, it’s sub­jec­tive. I’m not try­ing to be a film critic (or rather, what a film critic ought to be, in a per­fect world), whose job it is to eval­u­ate a film’s qual­ity and achieve­ment in light of a deep knowl­edge of world cin­ema and then leaven it with a per­sonal per­spec­tive. Rather, my rat­ings are the inverse: the per­sonal response first, and then a con­sid­er­a­tion of the movie’s his­tory and gen­eral crit­i­cal con­sen­sus. I wouldn’t nec­es­sar­ily give an acknowl­edged clas­sic a high rat­ing if I per­son­ally didn’t care for it.

So, I gave this one 3 stars even though it enjoys a cult fol­low­ing that will no doubt gang up on me on the street and pelt me with Ever­last­ing Gob­stop­pers while chant­ing the “Oompa Loompa” theme tune. I did like the bit where Wonka spook­ily intones “We are the music mak­ers, and we are the dream­ers of dreams.” I could swear that has been sam­pled in some elec­tron­ica track, although can’t for the life of me remem­ber which. Sounds like some­thing The Orb would seize on, but I’m not sure. Any­one? (an aside: The Future Sound of Lon­don sam­pled the movie dia­logue “Every­body on line… Lookin’ good,” and for some rea­son I always men­tally asso­ci­ated it with Jack Nichol­son in One Flew Over the Cuckoo Nest. Until one day, I’m watch­ing Aliens… and there it is, out of the mouth of a colo­nial marine.)

Sorry to add insult to injury, Mean Teacher, but I also must say here that I unex­pect­edly loved the Tim Bur­ton remake.

A Brief Word on R.E.M.

R.E.M. by Anton Corbijn

Being an unapolo­getic iPod/iTunes addict, I’m not too ashamed to announce I just fin­ished rip­ping all of my R.E.M. cds. So this is blog­wor­thy exactly how, you ask? Well, I was moved to post here because, all told, it amounts to over 28 hours of music. 28 HOURS! Isn’t that amaz­ing? On sec­ond thought, I sup­pose one could say that a day’s worth of songs isn’t that much con­sid­er­ing the band’s record­ing career is at least 20 years and run­ning. But I’m sure there’s a com­pletist out there with every sound­track, b-side, and boot­leg whose pile o’ R.E.M. MP3s reaches into not days but weeks.

Part of my iTunes obses­sion involves rat­ing every track (see­ing as how I’m con­stantly rip­ping more cds, it’s also a sisy­phusean Big-Dig-type job). So a quick glance at my track-by-track rat­ings betrays my favorite albums, in rough order: Doc­u­ment, Life’s Rich Pageant, Up, Mon­ster. Least favorites? The two most recent: Reveal and Around the Sun. What hap­pened after Up? I know that album isn’t well-regarded, but per­son­ally I love it for its flaws and hon­estly, its weird­ness. It’s their first album after drum­mer Bill Berry left the band, and it shows them reach­ing for a new sound. Per­haps the touches of elec­tron­ica are a bit dated (Bowie and U2 have also left much of that behind by now), but I like it. Unfor­tu­nately, the iden­tity they chose is to fol­low up on the tone set by the most bland song on Up, Daysleeper. It’s the sort of jan­gly bal­lad R.E.M. can dash off in their sleep. It lets the album down, and it’s a real bum­mer for the next two whole albums to share that feel. Oh well, I’m sure I’ll buy the next one to see if they jump off the cliff again.

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie poster

 

Yes, offi­cer, I’d like to file a report. You see, I’m being threat­ened. I received word that If I don’t actu­ally start writ­ing stuff in my blog, I’m going to have my vir­tual pants pulled down in front of at least half a dozen com­plete strangers with well-tended blogs. Or is that if I DO actu­ally start writ­ing stuff… oh, I’m con­fused. Wait! Offi­cer, where are you going? Oh well, I’ll just get on with a sen­tence or two about this DVD I just saw, and hope I remem­bered to put on pre­sentable under­things this morning.

I’m one of THOSE peo­ple, you know the ones… while the rest of my peers obsessed over Star Wars and Bat­tlestar Galac­tica, I had my head stuck in Doc­tor Who and Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. I would drop my Nerf foot­ball or Legos every Sat­ur­day after­noon at 3 to run inside and catch Doc­tor Who on PBS. And for some unsched­uled Brit-sci-fi fun, my col­lec­tion (com­plete but always far from mint) of Dou­glas Adams paper­backs always waited for me.

So for me and my ilk, 2005 looked to be a great year — not only was Doc­tor Who regen­er­ated (seem­ingly out of nowhere, when there was no hope to be had even by the most blindly opti­mistic of fans) by none other than the BBC itself, some­body at Dis­ney (Dis­ney?!) finally threw up their hands and actu­ally made that Hitchhiker’s script that had been kick­ing around Hol­ly­wood for decades (not an exag­ger­a­tion). Surely, some of my geek brethren must have grown up and scored jobs in the enter­tain­ment industry.

Not hav­ing been broad­cast any­where on this side of the planet, I’ve only man­aged to see less than half of the new Doc­tor Who sea­son thanks to the won­ders of inter­net piracy. I’m here to say that it is pure, glo­ri­ous, totally-different-and-yet-somehow-still-Who. But Hitchhiker’s? It’s a bit of a mess, I’m afraid. As a life­long fan, it’s a bit sur­pris­ing to find myself wish­ing the film was MORE main­stream. It’s hard to imag­ine any­body who had not read and reread the book (or at least already appre­cia­tive of some Monty Python-style humor) not being totally and com­pletely bewil­dered by the whole production.

Some of the cast­ing is so per­fect as to be impos­si­ble to imag­ine oth­er­wise: the voices of Alan Rick­man and Stephen Fry, and wot­sis­name from The Office was surely born to play the defin­i­tive Arthur Dent. But as much as I like Mos Def, it has to be said he’s a mum­bler (huh? what’d he say?). The film­mak­ers had the right idea to go for prac­ti­cal effects as often as pos­si­ble, includ­ing some much-missed old skool pup­pet work from the Jim Hen­son Com­pany, but it some­times just doesn’t sit right paired with off-the-shelf-pow-zoom-blow-your-mind-just-like-the-last-blockbuster-you-saw-this-summer CGI.

I reread the book for the first time in years, and it struck me that the whole thing is actu­ally quite short, focused, and sat­is­fy­ing. It shouldn’t have been too hard to fash­ion it into a movie, but evi­dently the pro­duc­ers (and Adams him­self, who co-wrote the screen­play) felt oth­er­wise, quickly aban­don­ing the plot specifics of the novel. But if the aim is to cre­ate an easily-digested sum­mer block­buster story, why (just for exam­ple) intro­duce a seem­ingly sig­nif­i­cant char­ac­ter who inca­pac­i­tates a major char­ac­ter, who then promptly drops out of the story and the sit­u­a­tion is never resolved? And the whole busi­ness about Zaphod’s brain would make no sense at all to any­one who isn’t a Hitchhiker’s expert (I wouldn’t have under­stood it myself if I hadn’t reread the book so recently).

Any­way, I could go on but it’s late and I need to charge my iPod and myself (ie go to sleep). So I’m going to take my pants off any­way! Ha!